3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bornadog
    WOOF Clubhouse Leader
    • Jan 2007
    • 65601

    Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

    2 wickets from Ashes
    FFC: Established 1883

    Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

    Comment

    • LostDoggy
      WOOF Member
      • Jan 2007
      • 8307

      Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

      The english actually showed some fight this innings.
      Positive cricket from Carberry, Pieterson, Bell, Stokes.

      But The ashes are ours once again!

      Comment

      • GVGjr
        Moderator
        • Nov 2006
        • 43905

        Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

        Originally posted by bornadog
        They were after quick runs. 103 not good enough?
        It's not really what I asked but anyway to answer the question no it isn't but that really isn't my point.

        If there was one cricketer in the side that could sky a shot in the air only to have it dropped by one fieldsman but picked up and have the stumps thrown down by another it would have to be Watson.

        He isn't getting done by great deliveries or brilliant acts by the opposition it's more than often enough poor shot selection or in this instance a lack of application of completing a simple run.

        He gives up too easily.
        Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

        Comment

        • mighty_west
          Coaching Staff
          • Feb 2008
          • 3377

          Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

          Originally posted by GVGjr
          It's not really what I asked but anyway to answer the question no it isn't but that really isn't my point.

          If there was one cricketer in the side that could sky a shot in the air only to have it dropped by one fieldsman but picked up and have the stumps thrown down by another it would have to be Watson.

          He isn't getting done by great deliveries or brilliant acts by the opposition it's more than often enough poor shot selection or in this instance a lack of application of completing a simple run.

          He gives up too easily.
          It was simply yet another brain fade, every ton is a great knock but as we know Watson has a history of doing dumb things.

          Comment

          • Sedat
            Hall of Fame
            • Sep 2007
            • 11049

            Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

            Reckon the Poms have found a genuine talent in Stokes (of course they had to poach him from another country).

            For a 22yo relative novice, he shows plenty of promise with the bat and he's more than sharp enough with the cherry in his hand. Very good tools to work with.
            "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

            Comment

            • Twodogs
              Administrator
              • Nov 2006
              • 27646

              Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

              He was really composed wasn't he? Just looked like he belonged there.
              They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

              Comment

              • Topdog
                Bulldog Team of the Century
                • Jan 2007
                • 7469

                Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

                Originally posted by GVGjr
                It's not really what I asked but anyway to answer the question no it isn't but that really isn't my point.

                If there was one cricketer in the side that could sky a shot in the air only to have it dropped by one fieldsman but picked up and have the stumps thrown down by another it would have to be Watson.

                He isn't getting done by great deliveries or brilliant acts by the opposition it's more than often enough poor shot selection or in this instance a lack of application of completing a simple run.

                He gives up too easily.
                I can only assume that he didnt see the wicket to describe it as "going for quick runs"

                Comment

                • jeemak
                  Bulldog Legend
                  • Oct 2010
                  • 21418

                  Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

                  Originally posted by Sedat
                  Reckon the Poms have found a genuine talent in Stokes (of course they had to poach him from another country).

                  For a 22yo relative novice, he shows plenty of promise with the bat and he's more than sharp enough with the cherry in his hand. Very good tools to work with.
                  Correctamundo.

                  The major thing they'll take away from this test is the fact they've found themselves an all rounder able to score under pressure.
                  TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

                  Comment

                  • Remi Moses
                    WOOF Member
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 14785

                    Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

                    Another import for England .
                    Great performance and totally unexpected to be honest.

                    Comment

                    • jeemak
                      Bulldog Legend
                      • Oct 2010
                      • 21418

                      Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

                      Originally posted by Remi Moses
                      Another import for England .
                      Great performance and totally unexpected to be honest.
                      Outsourcing.

                      Seriously, the Poms are the best. They'll get passionate about the British Lions, they'll steadfastly cheer imported cricketers without batting an eyelid. All the while they'll tell you how poorly spirited your nation is when it comes to being a gentleman cricketer, and cricket supporters, whilst threatening to boycott cricket venues in the process.

                      These guys have had their arses handed to them, and good for them. I really hope (but I'm not confident) we don't carry on like they did after the 2005 series, or even come close to that relative to the time we've not had the urn.

                      They have shown themselves to be once again, as hard as a poo sandwich.
                      TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

                      Comment

                      • hujsh
                        Hall of Fame
                        • Nov 2007
                        • 11734

                        Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

                        Originally posted by jeemak
                        Outsourcing.

                        These guys have had their arses handed to them, and good for them. I really hope (but I'm not confident) we don't carry on like they did after the 2005 series, or even come close to that relative to the time we've not had the urn.
                        Knighthoods for all.

                        OR

                        Knighthoods for some, miniature Australian flags for others.
                        [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                        Comment

                        • Twodogs
                          Administrator
                          • Nov 2006
                          • 27646

                          Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

                          Originally posted by jeemak
                          They have shown themselves to be once again, as hard as a poo sandwich.

                          Outstanding!
                          They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                          Comment

                          • LostDoggy
                            WOOF Member
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 8307

                            Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

                            I am surprised to read criticism of the WACA pitch. In my view it was a good Test wicket, one of the few in the world which offers pace and bounce. Yes it cracked up as I would expect. No wickets were lost as a direct result of the cracks which for the most part were more threatening than reality.

                            The charm of Test cricket is how the pitch rings changes to the nature of the game by at various times favouring fast bowlers, batting and slow bowlers. The Perth pitch did precisely that and it was fitting that Lyon removed the one batsman who was threatening to change the game.

                            Slow dusty turners as served up in England do no one any favours nor do roadways which kill bowlers of all types. The man of the match was a batsman and England got 350+ in the last innings. Nothing wrong with that pitch.

                            Comment

                            • Twodogs
                              Administrator
                              • Nov 2006
                              • 27646

                              Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

                              Originally posted by EJ Smith
                              I am surprised to read criticism of the WACA pitch. In my view it was a good Test wicket, one of the few in the world which offers pace and bounce. Yes it cracked up as I would expect. No wickets were lost as a direct result of the cracks which for the most part were more threatening than reality.

                              The charm of Test cricket is how the pitch rings changes to the nature of the game by at various times favouring fast bowlers, batting and slow bowlers. The Perth pitch did precisely that and it was fitting that Lyon removed the one batsman who was threatening to change the game.

                              Slow dusty turners as served up in England do no one any favours nor do roadways which kill bowlers of all types. The man of the match was a batsman and England got 350+ in the last innings. Nothing wrong with that pitch.

                              The fact the Poms made 350 in the fourth innings showed that pitch had a heap of cricket left in it. Those cracks looked dangerous but they ended up terrorising the 'keepers more than the batsmen.
                              They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                              Comment

                              • hujsh
                                Hall of Fame
                                • Nov 2007
                                • 11734

                                Re: 3rd Test Australia v England - WACA Perth

                                Yeah a good cricket pitch is not one that is still flat as a road on day 5. Wickets are the main source of excitement in test matches and we should be seeing 15-20 per match depending on declarations.
                                [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                                Comment

                                Working...