Melbourne Watch 2023/24

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mofra
    Hall of Fame
    • Dec 2006
    • 14788

    Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

    Originally posted by Grantysghost
    I guess he was injured at work and is employed by the club not the AFL.
    My guess is the club.
    Insurance is an interesting one. I dare say that may be the future however not sure the insurer would take the risk?

    Interesting read :https://anziif.com/professional-deve...ad-of-the-game
    Don't the AFLPA have a fund as well that contributes to this?
    Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

    Comment

    • Topdog
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Jan 2007
      • 7457

      Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

      Originally posted by Mofra
      Don't the AFLPA have a fund as well that contributes to this?
      its for the players not the clubs though. Extra money to help with things like lost earnings and medical expenses I believe.

      Comment

      • Twodogs
        Administrator
        • Nov 2006
        • 27645

        Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

        Originally posted by Grantysghost
        I guess he was injured at work and is employed by the club not the AFL.
        My guess is the club.
        Insurance is an interesting one. I dare say that may be the future however not sure the insurer would take the risk?

        Interesting read :https://anziif.com/professional-deve...ad-of-the-game
        Apparently AFL playing contracts are between player, the club and the League

        They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

        Comment

        • Grantysghost
          Bouncing Strong
          • Apr 2010
          • 18716

          Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

          Goody bag?

          Yes I made a meme.

          BT COME BACK!​

          Comment

          • Testekill
            WOOF Member
            • Jan 2015
            • 2327

            Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

            Demons looked good against a Blues side that crumpled under the slightest bit of pressure but their forward woes have not been fixed.

            Comment

            • mjp
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jan 2007
              • 7240

              Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

              Originally posted by Testekill
              Demons looked good against a Blues side that crumpled under the slightest bit of pressure but their forward woes have not been fixed.
              Don't worry, they're playing us soon enough! That always seems to cure what ails them.
              What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

              Comment

              • Testekill
                WOOF Member
                • Jan 2015
                • 2327

                Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

                I do want to say that it's absolutely cooked of the AFL to have Melbourne go into round one with a game already under their belt while we're going in after two weeks off. Opening Round is just an utter joke.

                Comment

                • hujsh
                  Hall of Fame
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 11717

                  Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

                  Originally posted by Testekill
                  I do want to say that it's absolutely cooked of the AFL to have Melbourne go into round one with a game already under their belt while we're going in after two weeks off. Opening Round is just an utter joke.
                  Cooked, crooked, cock up.
                  [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                  Comment

                  • jeemak
                    Bulldog Legend
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 21376

                    Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

                    Originally posted by Testekill
                    I do want to say that it's absolutely cooked of the AFL to have Melbourne go into round one with a game already under their belt while we're going in after two weeks off. Opening Round is just an utter joke.
                    The AFEL would argue that Melbourne is at a disadvantage in being sent to play Sydney first up. I kind of get it, especially if Melbourne has a shit day and gets done easily.

                    Being reactive to the NRL going to Vegas and thinking it's an opportunity to highlight the game in the northern states is flawed to me though. The AFEL and NRL aren't really in competition and a one-off round in non-traditional geographies won't do a single thing to change the dynamic that exists between the two codes/ leagues.

                    Compromising the fixture to this extent has no upside, but the buffoons at head office aren't pragmatic enough to see it and it's the type of shit that keeps them fat and happy. What is really amazing is how willing the AFEL is to compromise the fixture further than it already is in order to be seen to be innovating.
                    TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

                    Comment

                    • Uninformed
                      Draftee
                      • Jan 2023
                      • 727

                      Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

                      Originally posted by jeemak
                      The AFEL would argue that Melbourne is at a disadvantage in being sent to play Sydney first up. I kind of get it, especially if Melbourne has a shit day and gets done easily.

                      Being reactive to the NRL going to Vegas and thinking it's an opportunity to highlight the game in the northern states is flawed to me though. The AFEL and NRL aren't really in competition and a one-off round in non-traditional geographies won't do a single thing to change the dynamic that exists between the two codes/ leagues.

                      Compromising the fixture to this extent has no upside, but the buffoons at head office aren't pragmatic enough to see it and it's the type of shit that keeps them fat and happy. What is really amazing is how willing the AFEL is to compromise the fixture further than it already is in order to be seen to be innovating.
                      And what they pay themselves to do that is flat out theft from the players who actually do the work to earn the money.

                      Comment

                      • hujsh
                        Hall of Fame
                        • Nov 2007
                        • 11717

                        Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

                        Originally posted by Uninformed
                        And what they pay themselves to do that is flat out theft from the players who actually do the work to earn the money.
                        Hell yeah brother
                        [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                        Comment

                        • Bornadog
                          WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 65577

                          Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

                          Should Angus Brayshaw's contract still be included in the salary cap?

                          Personally I think it should be, but Melbourne is arguing otherwise.
                          FFC: Established 1883

                          Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                          Comment

                          • Axe Man
                            Hall of Fame
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 10866

                            Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

                            Originally posted by bornadog
                            Should Angus Brayshaw's contract still be included in the salary cap?

                            Personally I think it should be, but Melbourne is arguing otherwise.
                            Would you be happy if English signs a monster deal and is then forced out of the game with concussion and we cop the full whack to our salary cap?

                            I'm not sure what the right way to go is but there should be clearly established guidelines for concussion related retirements. Perhaps only a certain percentage should be included in the cap? Player welfare should be paramount so we don't want undue pressure on at risk players to continue playing due to the salary cap implications.

                            Comment

                            • Bornadog
                              WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 65577

                              Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

                              Originally posted by Axe Man
                              Would you be happy if English signs a monster deal and is then forced out of the game with concussion and we cop the full whack to our salary cap?

                              I'm not sure what the right way to go is but there should be clearly established guidelines for concussion related retirements. Perhaps only a certain percentage should be included in the cap? Player welfare should be paramount so we don't want undue pressure on at risk players to continue playing due to the salary cap implications.
                              What about other injuries that may force early retirement?
                              FFC: Established 1883

                              Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                              Comment

                              • hujsh
                                Hall of Fame
                                • Nov 2007
                                • 11717

                                Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24

                                Originally posted by bornadog
                                What about other injuries that may force early retirement?
                                I think concussion (not unfairly) deserves some special consideration given just how damaging it is on the quality of life of the athlete. Minimizing any incentive to make a player play with concussion related trauma generally seems a good idea to me.
                                [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

                                Comment

                                Working...