Melbourne Watch 2023/24
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24
I guess he was injured at work and is employed by the club not the AFL.
My guess is the club.
Insurance is an interesting one. I dare say that may be the future however not sure the insurer would take the risk?
Interesting read :https://anziif.com/professional-deve...ad-of-the-game
They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.Comment
-
-
What should I tell her? She's going to ask.Comment
-
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
-
Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24
Being reactive to the NRL going to Vegas and thinking it's an opportunity to highlight the game in the northern states is flawed to me though. The AFEL and NRL aren't really in competition and a one-off round in non-traditional geographies won't do a single thing to change the dynamic that exists between the two codes/ leagues.
Compromising the fixture to this extent has no upside, but the buffoons at head office aren't pragmatic enough to see it and it's the type of shit that keeps them fat and happy. What is really amazing is how willing the AFEL is to compromise the fixture further than it already is in order to be seen to be innovating.TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.Comment
-
Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24
The AFEL would argue that Melbourne is at a disadvantage in being sent to play Sydney first up. I kind of get it, especially if Melbourne has a shit day and gets done easily.
Being reactive to the NRL going to Vegas and thinking it's an opportunity to highlight the game in the northern states is flawed to me though. The AFEL and NRL aren't really in competition and a one-off round in non-traditional geographies won't do a single thing to change the dynamic that exists between the two codes/ leagues.
Compromising the fixture to this extent has no upside, but the buffoons at head office aren't pragmatic enough to see it and it's the type of shit that keeps them fat and happy. What is really amazing is how willing the AFEL is to compromise the fixture further than it already is in order to be seen to be innovating.Comment
-
Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24
Should Angus Brayshaw's contract still be included in the salary cap?
Personally I think it should be, but Melbourne is arguing otherwise.FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24
I'm not sure what the right way to go is but there should be clearly established guidelines for concussion related retirements. Perhaps only a certain percentage should be included in the cap? Player welfare should be paramount so we don't want undue pressure on at risk players to continue playing due to the salary cap implications.Comment
-
Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24
Would you be happy if English signs a monster deal and is then forced out of the game with concussion and we cop the full whack to our salary cap?
I'm not sure what the right way to go is but there should be clearly established guidelines for concussion related retirements. Perhaps only a certain percentage should be included in the cap? Player welfare should be paramount so we don't want undue pressure on at risk players to continue playing due to the salary cap implications.FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Melbourne Watch 2023/24
I think concussion (not unfairly) deserves some special consideration given just how damaging it is on the quality of life of the athlete. Minimizing any incentive to make a player play with concussion related trauma generally seems a good idea to me.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
Comment