Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mantis
    Hall of Fame
    • Apr 2007
    • 15447

    Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong

    Originally posted by Ozza
    I think Mantis might be talking more about agility (in terms of mobility) rather than straight line running - from a defensive aspect, or a 'well then ball hits the ground' perspective - Redpath/Crameri/Stringer/Minson or Campbell - is a bit on the clunky side.
    Spot on.

    Crameri for all his abilities as an elite runner is very poor defensively.

    Comment

    • jeemak
      Bulldog Legend
      • Oct 2010
      • 21829

      Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong

      Crameri averages 2.7 tackles a game which is more than Stringer and Jones, but also more than Wood, Murphy and Morris, whilst just being .3 tackles shy of Hunter's average.

      Not sure whether that's good or bad as I don't really have the time to go into numbers from other clubs, though it would be interesting to see how he stacks up against their similar players.

      Defensive work isn't just tackling either. He does do quite a lot of running to get numbers back to block space, sometimes I think to the detriment of his attacking work.
      TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

      Comment

      • Mofra
        Hall of Fame
        • Dec 2006
        • 14950

        Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong

        Originally posted by jeemak
        Crameri averages 2.7 tackles a game which is more than Stringer and Jones, but also more than Wood, Murphy and Morris, whilst just being .3 tackles shy of Hunter's average.

        Not sure whether that's good or bad as I don't really have the time to go into numbers from other clubs, though it would be interesting to see how he stacks up against their similar players.

        Defensive work isn't just tackling either. He does do quite a lot of running to get numbers back to block space, sometimes I think to the detriment of his attacking work.
        Crameri certainly works hard, his running off the ball is excellent. I'd love to see his kms per game.

        2.7 tackles seems pretty good for a tallish forward, considering it's near Jack Riewoldt at his best (who has lead the KPF tackle count in previous years) and much higher than our last genuine key target (Hall).
        Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

        Comment

        • 1eyedog
          Hall of Fame
          • Mar 2008
          • 13235

          Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong

          Originally posted by gogriff
          Chris Grant. Chris was 193cm 99kg, Jack is 194cm 100kg. Both are not known for their mobility but are good marks and have good foot skills. Jack obviously hasn't earned this comparison at this point but I see them as similar types of players
          And one had a heap of skill and the other had a few skills.

          Hope Jack goes well.
          But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

          Comment

          • divvydan
            WOOF Member
            • Oct 2009
            • 1502

            Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong

            Final changes:

            Griffen, Roughead, Redpath in for Roberts, Darley, Jones.

            I assume if Roughead doesn't come up, Roberts will play and Tutt likewise for Griffen.

            Comment

            • The Bulldogs Bite
              Hall of Fame
              • Dec 2006
              • 11246

              Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong

              Hard to argue with those changes.

              Nice to see Honeychurch given another shot at it. Although he didn't get much of it last week, I thought the signs were OK. He was still competing hard, and made some good defensive efforts late.
              W00F!

              Comment

              • jeemak
                Bulldog Legend
                • Oct 2010
                • 21829

                Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong

                Originally posted by The Bulldogs Bite
                Hard to argue with those changes.

                Nice to see Honeychurch given another shot at it. Although he didn't get much of it last week, I thought the signs were OK. He was still competing hard, and made some good defensive efforts late.
                Yeah I thought he'd be a chance to make way for Grant, though I'm happy he gets another shot at it.
                TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

                Comment

                • Happy Days
                  Hall of Fame
                  • May 2008
                  • 10142

                  Re: Match Committee - Round 16 vs Geelong

                  Originally posted by The Bulldogs Bite
                  Hard to argue with those changes.

                  Nice to see Honeychurch given another shot at it. Although he didn't get much of it last week, I thought the signs were OK. He was still competing hard, and made some good defensive efforts late.
                  Would have kept Roberts in ahead of Austin, but it's not a massive deal.
                  - I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -

                  Comment

                  Working...