Early Trade Rumours for 2022
Collapse
X
-
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
He's a big boy, could have said no that's a stupid idea Leon.Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
Leon recently admitted it was the wrong thing to do, ie to send Haynes out.FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
Other reports put it at $800k. The problem is he still has 2 years left and will be 32 by the time it ends, so extending on less $$$ per season isn't really an option. If GWS want to pay a portion maybe we can talk.Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
Haynes is exactly what we need depending on the cost going the other way?
The million is obviously back-ended and therefore inflated but if we add on a second season to spread the salary it is manageable.
With the emergence of Himmelberg, Haynes lost his role and they tried to convert him into a winger with limited success. He is an elite 3rd tall with genuine intercepting ability, something we've desperately missed.
Where do I sign?Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
We appear to have offered Jones and Lobb 3 year deals which takes them into a dangerous territory.Comment
-
BT COME BACK!
Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
To be fair, having your larynx damaged would be pretty nasty. But as we all know Marcus wouldn't have done this with intent to injure.BT COME BACK!
Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
Not sure what you mean here? Clubs usually drive front or back loading contracts to help with their salary cap.Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
Nah. It’s all good. Contracts are structured to work in with the clubs cap. Some are front loaded, back ended or averaged. It’s not an issue, as it’s usually club instigated. If a club mismanages their cap, and has to let good players/picks go, then that’s on them. The clubs are the ones getting hurt.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
I said it before but if Bont can forgive Hayes for being such a pussy then I’d be happy to have him. MJP mentioned that Hayes can be a bit of a ball stopper but if he creates intercepts it should give our ball users easy opportunities to slingshot that they were pretty much wholly starved of last year.- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
Nah. It’s all good. Contracts are structured to work in with the clubs cap. Some are front loaded, back ended or averaged. It’s not an issue, as it’s usually club instigated. If a club mismanages their cap, and has to let good players/picks go, then that’s on them. The clubs are the ones getting hurt.BT COME BACK!
Comment
-
Re: Early Trade Rumours for 2022
You need flexibility in the cap to manage the minimum and maximum levels of cap needed under the rules. Often if a club is under, they will pay players early (with their consent) and then bank the cap for/in future years. Competent managers like Power would be doing it all the time, but the media don’t report ‘rich footballers got richer, sooner’ stories. Incompetent list managers will put thing off ‘until tomorrow’ and when ‘tomorrow’ comes they’re forced to deal with it. Which is good for clubs like ours. Good players get moved on cheaper from trade value and comes with money outside our cap for the player.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
Comment