Trade Rumours 2024

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • josie
    Coaching Staff
    • Oct 2012
    • 4385

    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

    If we swap Baz for SDK is there a risk we are just be a half way house to Blues? ie poached in a few years?
    Josie :)

    Our day will come
    And we'll have everything.
    We'll share the joy
    Just like '54 again.

    Comment

    • Sedat
      Hall of Fame
      • Sep 2007
      • 11104

      Re: Trade Rumours 2024

      Originally posted by bornadog
      Keath is finishing up, Jones and Lobb are both in their 30s and not contracted past next year. SDK and Busslinger gives us genuine key backs for the next decade.
      Buss is a long way from 100% bankable. I hope he comes good but he hasn't even played a game yet.
      "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

      Comment

      • Bornadog
        WOOF Clubhouse Leader
        • Jan 2007
        • 65920

        Re: Trade Rumours 2024

        Originally posted by Sedat
        Buss is a long way from 100% bankable. I hope he comes good but he hasn't even played a game yet.
        Then we do need an SDK.

        I was talking the future, and we don't even know if Buzz will cut it at AFL level, but it is a plan
        FFC: Established 1883

        Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

        Comment

        • azabob
          Hall of Fame
          • Sep 2008
          • 15187

          Re: Trade Rumours 2024

          Cal Twoomey mentioned today that Collingwood is an unlikely destination for Peatling.
          More of an In Bruges guy?

          Comment

          • hujsh
            Hall of Fame
            • Nov 2007
            • 11820

            Re: Trade Rumours 2024

            Originally posted by josie
            If we swap Baz for SDK is there a risk we are just be a half way house to Blues? ie poached in a few years?
            Contract offered would be a long term one
            [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

            Comment

            • Virgin-Dog
              Rookie List
              • Feb 2023
              • 257

              Re: Trade Rumours 2024

              If we did get SDK for Baz in a trade, what exactly does that mean for Croft? Looking at our spine long term, we'd have:

              Tall Defenders - SDK, JOD, Buss, arguably Khamis and Coffield
              Rucks - English, Smith
              Tall Forwards - Darcy, JUH, Naughton

              That's a lot of top end talent that should be playing every week, but what do we do with Croft?

              Makes for interesting times ahead with all these flaky rumours around JUH leaving. Because the only way I see everyone fitting (assuming Khamis/Coffield are depth options) is if JUH left and Croft is viewed as a forward, not defender.

              Comment

              • Axe Man
                Hall of Fame
                • Nov 2008
                • 10968

                Re: Trade Rumours 2024

                Originally posted by hujsh
                Contract offered would be a long term one
                Yep, the BF rumour from last week (that apparently was repeated on Trade Radio today) was that we had offered a lucrative 6 year deal.

                Comment

                • Bornadog
                  WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 65920

                  Re: Trade Rumours 2024

                  Originally posted by Virgin-Dog
                  If we did get SDK for Baz in a trade, what exactly does that mean for Croft? Looking at our spine long term, we'd have:

                  Tall Defenders - SDK, JOD, Buss, arguably Khamis and Coffield
                  Rucks - English, Smith
                  Tall Forwards - Darcy, JUH, Naughton

                  That's a lot of top end talent that should be playing every week, but what do we do with Croft?

                  Makes for interesting times ahead with all these flaky rumours around JUH leaving. Because the only way I see everyone fitting (assuming Khamis/Coffield are depth options) is if JUH left and Croft is viewed as a forward, not defender.
                  Looking at Croft, he is at least 3 years away from building his body and being AFL ready, but I know what you mean with your list above.
                  FFC: Established 1883

                  Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                  Comment

                  • bulldogsthru&thru
                    Bulldog Team of the Century
                    • May 2011
                    • 7701

                    Re: Trade Rumours 2024

                    Originally posted by ReLoad
                    Why not both?
                    I'm not sure we have the trade capital for both. We'll want our picks next year for a shot at Butters. I'd hate to blow capital on SDK if it meant we aren't in with a shot at Butters.

                    Comment

                    • Bornadog
                      WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 65920

                      Re: Trade Rumours 2024

                      Originally posted by bulldogsthru&thru
                      I'm not sure we have the trade capital for both. We'll want our picks next year for a shot at Butters. I'd hate to blow capital on SDK if it meant we aren't in with a shot at Butters.
                      The way I read Reload's post was SDK plus Geelong's first round pick for Smith
                      FFC: Established 1883

                      Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                      Comment

                      • jazzadogs
                        Bulldog Team of the Century
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 5554

                        Re: Trade Rumours 2024

                        Originally posted by bornadog
                        The way I read Reload's post was SDK plus Geelong's first round pick for Smith
                        Because SDK is contracted, and given the higher currency for KPDs, my feel is that Geelong would be asking us to sweeten the deal... Not just throwing in another first round pick.

                        I'm not sold on SDK but if the alternative is pick 20 and a future second, I think there is definitely less risk with him.

                        Comment

                        • Happy Days
                          Hall of Fame
                          • May 2008
                          • 10069

                          Re: Trade Rumours 2024

                          Maybe we could ask Naughton’s thoughts on bringing over SDK given SDK has smashed him every time they’ve been against each other.
                          - I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -

                          Comment

                          • kruder
                            Coaching Staff
                            • May 2011
                            • 3761

                            Re: Trade Rumours 2024

                            Originally posted by Happy Days
                            Maybe we could ask Naughton’s thoughts on bringing over SDK given SDK has smashed him every time they’ve been against each other.
                            Was about to say the same thing has killed Naughton on many occasions I remember a game I watched live at marvel potentially in 2022 where he was really impressive one on one against Naughty.

                            I wouldn't say SDK is soft thats for sure its more about how much $$$ we want to put towards talls where once again smalls dominated the finals. I'm really keen to take our first rounder to the draft we have seen how quickly they can impact the finals let alone a regular season game.

                            SDK is tempting though with plenty of question marks around JOD and Buss going forward, JOD had an average season at best I still think he should have spent more time at Footscray to develop.

                            Comment

                            • The Bulldogs Bite
                              Hall of Fame
                              • Dec 2006
                              • 11101

                              Re: Trade Rumours 2024

                              Geelong played hard ball over Esava for 2 straight years, I find it hard to believe they'd deal with SDK when they're trying to buy a flag before Dangerfield retires.

                              I get it's slightly different because they're after Smith, but Mackie is earning a bit of a reputation for being difficult. Perhaps if they could get Oliver to commit it makes SDK expendable because it's unlikely they otherwise bring him and Smith in, but I suspect Oliver stays.

                              In terms of raw talent I think we still lack for a quality KPD. Jones is at or near the end, Lobb might have a couple of years, I'm unconvinced on JOD, Busslinger and Croft haven't played a game.
                              W00F!

                              Comment

                              • Dancin' Douggy
                                WOOF Member
                                • Oct 2007
                                • 2877

                                Re: Trade Rumours 2024

                                Remember when the whole football world presumed Buddy was going to GWS but he ended up at the Swans?
                                Some jungle drums beating re Bazlenka and the Tigers. Right age profile. Big club with massive media exposure and fan base. He would immediately be the biggest name at the club. If he wants brand attention there it is. They have the draft picks. They have the salary space. B Smith to the Tigers is huge headline news. Watch this space

                                Comment

                                Working...