Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mantis
    Hall of Fame
    • Apr 2007
    • 15319

    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

    Originally posted by jeemak
    Unchanged.

    Not sure this'll be popular.
    Bevo sending a big ''up yours'' to the haters... Live by the sword!

    Comment

    • DOG GOD
      Bulldog Team of the Century
      • Jul 2007
      • 6387

      Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

      WOW….Wood remains…was always going to happen though.
      I will never see #16 the same!!

      Comment

      • bulldogtragic
        The List Manager
        • Jan 2007
        • 34316

        Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

        Originally posted by DOG GOD
        WOW….Wood remains…was always going to happen though.
        And JJ. The ‘forward’ who barely kicks one across every two games and has the speed to run down players, and has low tackle numbers.

        Nothing like doubling down as you are losing.
        Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

        Comment

        • bulldogtragic
          The List Manager
          • Jan 2007
          • 34316

          Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

          Look at the bench. It’s a whose who of Bevo’s most favoured players. Cordy stiff to miss out.
          Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

          Comment

          • Bornadog
            WOOF Clubhouse Leader
            • Jan 2007
            • 66089

            Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

            Originally posted by bulldogtragic
            Look at the bench. It’s a whose who of Bevo’s most favoured players. Cordy stiff to miss out.
            I am really not worried about the overall team. Yes would have been good if Martin was fit, and you can drop some and bring in others, but it is the mids we need to fire up.

            We need Bont playing at his best and Libba firing, with contributions from the other mids.

            Listening to Bevo during the week when asked about Bont. He said he is giving is all for the team. I think he is trying to do it all. He needs others to do their jobs. Bont is forward, back, middle covering huge amount of ground and I think overdoing it, and running out of puff.
            FFC: Established 1883

            Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

            Comment

            • DOG GOD
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jul 2007
              • 6387

              Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

              Ok…it’s ok to have preconceived faith in your players, but what sort of message is this giving to the playing group? Guys on the fringe are continually seeing guys like JJ, Wood, Hannan etc picked weekly and performing poorly for weeks on end, whereas Wallis, Lipinski, Schache have been in a revolving door all year.

              Whatever the MC are seeing in the games of JJ etc certainly isn’t what I’m seeing. JJ, in this role, should be a tackling machine, but he’s nowhere near it. Plays maybe 15 really good mins a game.

              I could go on, but it just depresses me the more I think about it.

              JJ, Hannan, Wood and possible Cordy should NOT be in the team this week, and if we were dead serious about beating Essendon and going deep to the GF, they wouldn’t be.
              I will never see #16 the same!!

              Comment

              • jeemak
                Bulldog Legend
                • Oct 2010
                • 21577

                Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

                Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                How do you feel about it?
                I understand going for stability, and I don't think the likes of Cordy or Wood are going to be replaced by anyone who's going to do much better (but possibly these guys are a blind spot for me as I don't think they've been as horrible as others think they've been).

                The effort against Port was there, though the execution wasn't and I think we're taking a gamble by thinking that will improve to the level required. So it makes me a bit nervous.

                However we weren't bringing in Sweet, and without Bringing in Martin there's no change to the ruck on paper. We've lacked cohesion up forward, but making more changes to an already unsettled forward line has its drawbacks. Banking on the cohesion improving is reasonable but fraught with danger, so it makes me a bit nervous.

                So overall it's a conservative approach, which won't make a material difference to our prospects given we live and die on the back of how well our engine room competes.

                Have I mentioned I'm nervous?
                TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

                Comment

                • comrade
                  Hall of Fame
                  • Jun 2008
                  • 17920

                  Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

                  Originally posted by comrade
                  Who should?

                  Roarke
                  Schache
                  Scott
                  Hannan

                  Who will?

                  JJ
                  Roarke
                  Hannan
                  Wood
                  Completely predictable.
                  Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.

                  Comment

                  • bulldogsthru&thru
                    Bulldog Team of the Century
                    • May 2011
                    • 7708

                    Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

                    Meh….expected nothing less. We haven’t mixed things up for 5 years so why would Bevo start now?

                    Comment

                    • Bornadog
                      WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 66089

                      Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

                      Originally posted by bulldogsthru&thru
                      Meh….expected nothing less. We haven’t mixed things up for 5 years so why would Bevo start now?
                      I don't understand this comment?
                      FFC: Established 1883

                      Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                      Comment

                      • bulldogtragic
                        The List Manager
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 34316

                        Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

                        Does this make us predictable then?

                        Currently substandard defenders and forwards picked. If you can shut our mids down or quieten them enough, then that’s the ball game. The rest could take care of itself if they set up well enough in defence and attack. Shut down or blunt our engine room is job 1, 2 & 3.
                        Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                        Comment

                        • bulldogtragic
                          The List Manager
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 34316

                          Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

                          Originally posted by comrade
                          Completely predictable.
                          You win. Or lose. Both?
                          Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                          Comment

                          • bulldogsthru&thru
                            Bulldog Team of the Century
                            • May 2011
                            • 7708

                            Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

                            Originally posted by jeemak
                            I understand going for stability, and I don't think the likes of Cordy or Wood are going to be replaced by anyone who's going to do much better (but possibly these guys are a blind spot for me as I don't think they've been as horrible as others think they've been).

                            The effort against Port was there, though the execution wasn't and I think we're taking a gamble by thinking that will improve to the level required. So it makes me a bit nervous.

                            However we weren't bringing in Sweet, and without Bringing in Martin there's no change to the ruck on paper. We've lacked cohesion up forward, but making more changes to an already unsettled forward line has its drawbacks. Banking on the cohesion improving is reasonable but fraught with danger, so it makes me a bit nervous.

                            So overall it's a conservative approach, which won't make a material difference to our prospects given we live and die on the back of how well our engine room competes.

                            Have I mentioned I'm nervous?
                            Despite not making any changes, Essendon aren’t good enough to beat us if our mids fire. So that’s all we need to win this one. Big question mark though given previous performances.

                            Comment

                            • 1eyedog
                              Hall of Fame
                              • Mar 2008
                              • 13186

                              Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

                              Originally posted by Mantis
                              It would be a bold (crazy) decision to play him in a role he's never played in for our most important game of the season.
                              Yeah he was never going to play.
                              But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.

                              Comment

                              • bulldogtragic
                                The List Manager
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 34316

                                Re: Always Right Match Committee - Finals Week 1

                                Originally posted by bulldogsthru&thru
                                Despite not making any changes, Essendon aren’t good enough to beat us if our mids fire. So that’s all we need to win this one. Big question mark though given previous performances.
                                All we needed to beat Essendon, Hawthorn, Port & Essendon again this week is our mids need to fire…
                                Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                                Comment

                                Working...