Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread
Collapse
X
-
Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread
Why wouldn't they?
I doubt they'd be offered much better. They aren't shopping him around because he wants to leave, they're shopping him around because he's had too many indiscretions. Therefore, surely his price is not worthy of a first round draft pick.
IMO the trade would make sense. Ray moves to Essendon for greater opportunity and helps them with a bit of experience/running ability, whilst we pick up another needed ball carrier with genuine pace.W00F!Comment
-
Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread
Why wouldn't they?
I doubt they'd be offered much better. They aren't shopping him around because he wants to leave, they're shopping him around because he's had too many indiscretions. Therefore, surely his price is not worthy of a first round draft pick.
IMO the trade would make sense. Ray moves to Essendon for greater opportunity and helps them with a bit of experience/running ability, whilst we pick up another needed ball carrier with genuine pace.
I think unless someone is going to offer us a semi-decent KPP for him (i.e. Rusling, Reid, Thorpe etc - Which is very highly unlikely) then i think this could be a good straight swap.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread
2008 Comparison
Stat - Lovett - Ray
Age: 26 -22
Height: 183 - 187
Weight: 75 - 84
Kick: 12 - 7.9
H/ball: 6.2 - 11.2
Tackles: 2.8 - 2.5
Marks: 4.3 - 5.8
Goals: 0.8 - 0.3
Lovett is 4 years older, has discipline issues, is smaller and lighter than Farren and averages less possessions and less marks than Farren and tackles and scores just about at the same level.
Looks similar to me.
Essendon should be thinking long and hard about it. They get a player looking to establish themselves in their own right as a former number 4 pick. His head is screwed on right, he would be one of the quickest and fittest at the club and is a few years advanced of the group Knights is putting together.
Win/Win or nil all draw.
Either way, it would ge a good trade.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread
I didn't realise Lovett was 26?
Are you sure that's correct?
I thought he was still reasonably young. 23 or 24ish.W00F!Comment
-
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread
2008 Comparison
Stat - Lovett - Ray
Age: 26 -22
Height: 183 - 187
Weight: 75 - 84
Kick: 12 - 7.9
H/ball: 6.2 - 11.2
Tackles: 2.8 - 2.5
Marks: 4.3 - 5.8
Goals: 0.8 - 0.3
Lovett is 4 years older, has discipline issues, is smaller and lighter than Farren and averages less possessions and less marks than Farren and tackles and scores just about at the same level.
Looks similar to me.
Essendon should be thinking long and hard about it. They get a player looking to establish themselves in their own right as a former number 4 pick. His head is screwed on right, he would be one of the quickest and fittest at the club and is a few years advanced of the group Knights is putting together.
Win/Win or nil all draw.
Either way, it would ge a good trade.Comment
-
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread
That's strange, I thought he was younger. I wonder if that has any effect on whether or not we chase him, more so in regards to his behavioral problems. At 26, it's unlikely we'll be able to 'turn him around' so to speak.
He's a little inconsistent, but it's his ability to break the lines with pace & use his good foot skills that are of attraction. Ray finds enough of the ball, he just doesn't do enough with it. Lovett would be a better fit for our side.W00F!Comment
-
Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread
He failed the bulldogs medical i believe.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread
I want decent height, not average height.
You are right about us enquiring after him last season. Port wanted too much. They would obviously want less but I'd still not bother.[COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]Comment
-
Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread
I get scared when names like Damon White get thrown up. They only do so because they have a bit of height about them, not because they are good players.
I want decent height, not average height.
You are right about us enquiring after him last season. Port wanted too much. They would obviously want less but I'd still not bother.
I.e. Boyle. Hasn't done a heap on the 5th defender, yet some think he will do something on the 1st defender.
Sorry, we either need a proven performer (i.e. Hall) or a kid who hasn't had opportunities (i.e. Thorpe).
White, Boyle and co. is a waste and i would prefer punt on a kid like Boumann or Jesse Wells than payout for them.Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
Comment