Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Desipura
    WOOF Member
    • Mar 2008
    • 4344

    Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

    Originally posted by 42-C-3
    On the live-chat of the Hun today, Aker said we need to focus on a ruckman. Interesting that was his priority not a forward KPP.

    If that is more the reality from the clubs perspective, should we look as Simon Taylor and get in his ear about missing the grand final? Are their others out there.

    Skipper is the only back-up and is not to AFL standard as a ruk.

    Interesting.
    And Aker would be correct although we need a fwd as much as we need a ruckman.

    Comment

    • Mantis
      Hall of Fame
      • Apr 2007
      • 15447

      Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

      Do we look at a Ray for Lovett trade?

      Comment

      • Desipura
        WOOF Member
        • Mar 2008
        • 4344

        Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

        Originally posted by Mantis
        Do we look at a Ray for Lovett trade?
        We do......but Essendon won't!

        Comment

        • The Bulldogs Bite
          Hall of Fame
          • Dec 2006
          • 11245

          Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

          Originally posted by Desipura
          We do......but Essendon won't!
          Why wouldn't they?

          I doubt they'd be offered much better. They aren't shopping him around because he wants to leave, they're shopping him around because he's had too many indiscretions. Therefore, surely his price is not worthy of a first round draft pick.

          IMO the trade would make sense. Ray moves to Essendon for greater opportunity and helps them with a bit of experience/running ability, whilst we pick up another needed ball carrier with genuine pace.
          W00F!

          Comment

          • bulldogtragic
            The List Manager
            • Jan 2007
            • 34289

            Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

            Originally posted by The Bulldogs Bite
            Why wouldn't they?

            I doubt they'd be offered much better. They aren't shopping him around because he wants to leave, they're shopping him around because he's had too many indiscretions. Therefore, surely his price is not worthy of a first round draft pick.

            IMO the trade would make sense. Ray moves to Essendon for greater opportunity and helps them with a bit of experience/running ability, whilst we pick up another needed ball carrier with genuine pace.
            I agree. If Farren had a great year, you'd say he was worth more. Lovett hasn't had a brilliant year, but is worth more on face value. Then factor in all his problems and untaken second opportunities, and haggling aside, it is probably a very close thing. Lovett would be good for us if he keeps his head on straiht and Ray would be a good fit for the dons.

            I think unless someone is going to offer us a semi-decent KPP for him (i.e. Rusling, Reid, Thorpe etc - Which is very highly unlikely) then i think this could be a good straight swap.
            Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

            Comment

            • bulldogtragic
              The List Manager
              • Jan 2007
              • 34289

              Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

              2008 Comparison

              Stat - Lovett - Ray

              Age: 26 -22
              Height: 183 - 187
              Weight: 75 - 84

              Kick: 12 - 7.9
              H/ball: 6.2 - 11.2
              Tackles: 2.8 - 2.5
              Marks: 4.3 - 5.8
              Goals: 0.8 - 0.3


              Lovett is 4 years older, has discipline issues, is smaller and lighter than Farren and averages less possessions and less marks than Farren and tackles and scores just about at the same level.

              Looks similar to me.

              Essendon should be thinking long and hard about it. They get a player looking to establish themselves in their own right as a former number 4 pick. His head is screwed on right, he would be one of the quickest and fittest at the club and is a few years advanced of the group Knights is putting together.

              Win/Win or nil all draw.

              Either way, it would ge a good trade.
              Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

              Comment

              • The Bulldogs Bite
                Hall of Fame
                • Dec 2006
                • 11245

                Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

                I didn't realise Lovett was 26?

                Are you sure that's correct?

                I thought he was still reasonably young. 23 or 24ish.
                W00F!

                Comment

                • bulldogtragic
                  The List Manager
                  • Jan 2007
                  • 34289

                  Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

                  Originally posted by The Bulldogs Bite
                  I didn't realise Lovett was 26?

                  Are you sure that's correct?

                  I thought he was still reasonably young. 23 or 24ish.
                  25 and 10 months to be more accurate.
                  Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                  Comment

                  • Dancin' Douggy
                    WOOF Member
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 2876

                    Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

                    Originally posted by 42-C-3
                    2008 Comparison

                    Stat - Lovett - Ray

                    Age: 26 -22
                    Height: 183 - 187
                    Weight: 75 - 84

                    Kick: 12 - 7.9
                    H/ball: 6.2 - 11.2
                    Tackles: 2.8 - 2.5
                    Marks: 4.3 - 5.8
                    Goals: 0.8 - 0.3


                    Lovett is 4 years older, has discipline issues, is smaller and lighter than Farren and averages less possessions and less marks than Farren and tackles and scores just about at the same level.

                    Looks similar to me.

                    Essendon should be thinking long and hard about it. They get a player looking to establish themselves in their own right as a former number 4 pick. His head is screwed on right, he would be one of the quickest and fittest at the club and is a few years advanced of the group Knights is putting together.

                    Win/Win or nil all draw.

                    Either way, it would ge a good trade.
                    Looking at those stats, why would we want Lovett?

                    Comment

                    • bulldogtragic
                      The List Manager
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 34289

                      Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

                      Originally posted by Dancin' Douggy
                      Looking at those stats, why would we want Lovett?
                      Not a bad replacement for Ray and/or Eagleton.
                      Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                      Comment

                      • The Bulldogs Bite
                        Hall of Fame
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 11245

                        Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

                        Originally posted by 42-C-3
                        25 and 10 months to be more accurate.
                        That's strange, I thought he was younger. I wonder if that has any effect on whether or not we chase him, more so in regards to his behavioral problems. At 26, it's unlikely we'll be able to 'turn him around' so to speak.

                        Originally posted by Dancin' Douggy
                        Looking at those stats, why would we want Lovett?
                        He's a little inconsistent, but it's his ability to break the lines with pace & use his good foot skills that are of attraction. Ray finds enough of the ball, he just doesn't do enough with it. Lovett would be a better fit for our side.
                        W00F!

                        Comment

                        • LostDoggy
                          WOOF Member
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 8307

                          Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

                          In regards to a KP forward, the Bulldogs looked at Damon White last year, at 25 is he still an option worth pursuing? He's 25, 193cm and 95kg. I believe he comes out of contract this year as well.

                          Comment

                          • bulldogtragic
                            The List Manager
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 34289

                            Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

                            Originally posted by stevw9
                            In regards to a KP forward, the Bulldogs looked at Damon White last year, at 25 is he still an option worth pursuing? He's 25, 193cm and 95kg. I believe he comes out of contract this year as well.
                            Degenerative knees.

                            He failed the bulldogs medical i believe.
                            Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                            Comment

                            • The Coon Dog
                              Bulldog Team of the Century
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 7579

                              Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

                              Originally posted by stevw9
                              In regards to a KP forward, the Bulldogs looked at Damon White last year, at 25 is he still an option worth pursuing? He's 25, 193cm and 95kg. I believe he comes out of contract this year as well.
                              I get scared when names like Damon White get thrown up. They only do so because they have a bit of height about them, not because they are good players.

                              I want decent height, not average height.

                              You are right about us enquiring after him last season. Port wanted too much. They would obviously want less but I'd still not bother.
                              [COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]

                              Comment

                              • bulldogtragic
                                The List Manager
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 34289

                                Re: Official 2008 Draft/Trade Thread

                                Originally posted by The Coon Dog
                                I get scared when names like Damon White get thrown up. They only do so because they have a bit of height about them, not because they are good players.

                                I want decent height, not average height.

                                You are right about us enquiring after him last season. Port wanted too much. They would obviously want less but I'd still not bother.
                                I also get nervous. As these players haven't done a lot as a third string forwards, and yet we expect them to come top us and get the #1 defender and we expect more.

                                I.e. Boyle. Hasn't done a heap on the 5th defender, yet some think he will do something on the 1st defender.

                                Sorry, we either need a proven performer (i.e. Hall) or a kid who hasn't had opportunities (i.e. Thorpe).

                                White, Boyle and co. is a waste and i would prefer punt on a kid like Boumann or Jesse Wells than payout for them.
                                Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                                Comment

                                Working...