If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Yep, things can change very quickly in football. We've still got a long way to go but it's great for all involved to get a result to illustrate we're moving in the right direction.
He has rolled the dice a little to focus on attack more at the expense of numbers at the ball. Better to watch.
He did role the dice to a degree - but it helps when you have the right balance, which we did. Hopefully injuries allow us to continue to have the balance.
It will be interesting to see when and if Cross and Wallis comeback into the team.
2008, 2009, and 2010, we were second highest each year in contested possessions.
The Saints in those same years were 5th, 3rd and 4th. Its a bloody myth that we weren't good at CP under Eade.
We might have won the contested possession stats under Eade but we were out muscled around the stoppages by the better teams. This is an example of when the stats don't tell the whole story.
I think it is unedifying for some posters (moderators no less) to gloat and criticise those asking pertinent questions following a run of 18 losses in 19 matches. The title of this thread is poor but as BMac himself noted yesterday, asking questions following such a barren run is actually a healthy thing for our club.
Over the past 12 months, I've been wanting to see BMac influence proceedings from the box during game day and have been disappointed in this aspect of BMac's tenure thus far. But to his eternal credit, BMac genuinely impacted the flow of the contest from the coaches box yesterday and was a big factor in stemming the St Kilda momentum on a couple of occasions with a number of key positional changes. He also got the players to run and carry far more, with yesterday's run and dare a welcome contrast to our static and predictable ball movement for most of the last 12 months.
I thoroughly enjoyed the way we played and the way we were coached yesterday, and I sure as hell enjoyed the end result against those filthy maggots - that was a long time coming.
2008, 2009, and 2010, we were second highest each year in contested possessions.
The Saints in those same years were 5th, 3rd and 4th. Its a bloody myth that we weren't good at CP under Eade.
Hmm, we definitely struggled in that area when we played the Saints.
Little separates these teams in raw ball-winning stats. In total disposals, the Western Bulldogs rank second and the Saints fourth; in contested ball the Bulldogs rank third and the Saints rank fourth, and in kicking efficiency they are ranked first and second respectively. But for form against each other you have to look deeper. As the Collingwood coach said last week: "We did not get our hands on the ball." That has been the case both times these teams have played this year, a difference of 82 and 73 possessions St Kilda's way, with the Saints easily winning the contested ball. Quite simply, the Saints have denied the Bulldogs time in possession, and have not got involved in an up-tempo style of game
Comment