If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
ledge, my man, your first comment on this page sans link was pretty wowserish
Nowhere in that article did I get the impression we were picking up Hunter with our second round pick, especially when the article claims we're going to face clubs risking high draft picks just to keep us accountable.......
You lost me I didn't say it was going to happen, the article implies another club might take him before 27 thus if we want him we will have to take him at 27.
Whether the club thinks he is worth 27 is another thing, but I believe the club would take him at 46
ledge, my man, your first comment on this page sans link was pretty wowserish
Nowhere in that article did I get the impression we were picking up Hunter with our second round pick, especially when the article claims we're going to face clubs risking high draft picks just to keep us accountable.......
Yes, very amateurish on the journos behalf.
All the info on Hunter in there seems like regurgitated forum talk.
Well the article pretty much says he will go before our next pick at 46 but in saying that it all depends on trades done and the shuffling of draft picks but right at this minute that's how it stands.
If he's nominated as a F/S, we make the decision before trade week.
Ja, strange how often this comes up considering how many times it's been mentioned (let alone such a potential glaring flaw in the system being left in).
Comment