ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sedat
    Hall of Fame
    • Sep 2007
    • 11243

    Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

    Originally posted by EasternWest
    Disagree. All balls are created equal.
    You know how much I enjoy being a contrarian. No problems whatsoever legally - it's out every day of the week and twice on Sundays. If it was me batting and it was mid-over I'd be dirty at myself for being an idiot. If it was the last ball of the over and I was breathing a sign of relief getting to the end of the over with my wicket still intact, I'd probably approach the keeper like Javed did to Lillee and start a brawl, but that's just me. I completely understand the counter-argument.

    Originally posted by EasternWest
    Disagree. If the metric to be used is going to be "that's the rules" then the rules also apply to Bairstow's wicket. The fact that they're different types of decisions is irrelevant.
    See above. There's grey in life and this is one of those times IMO. Again, I understand the counter-argument 100%

    Originally posted by EasternWest
    Agree, test match cricket, and more specifically Ashes test match cricket, is so far advanced of any other form of cricket it's not funny.
    Yep. If England go back into their shell, what do we have left in test cricket? The jig is almost up for the long form of the game if we are going to have dull, dreary summers with shit opponents like we've had the last couple of years. And if that happens and we have to endure endless T20/One Hundred style franchise tournaments, the game is basically cooked except in India.
    "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

    Comment

    • EasternWest
      Hall of Fame
      • Aug 2009
      • 10002

      Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

      Originally posted by Sedat
      You know how much I enjoy being a contrarian. No problems whatsoever legally - it's out every day of the week and twice on Sundays. If it was me batting and it was mid-over I'd be dirty at myself for being an idiot. If it was the last ball of the over and I was breathing a sign of relief getting to the end of the over with my wicket still intact, I'd probably approach the keeper like Javed did to Lillee and start a brawl, but that's just me. I completely understand the counter-argument.


      See above. There's grey in life and this is one of those times IMO. Again, I understand the counter-argument 100%


      Yep. If England go back into their shell, what do we have left in test cricket? The jig is almost up for the long form of the game if we are going to have dull, dreary summers with shit opponents like we've had the last couple of years. And if that happens and we have to endure endless T20/One Hundred style franchise tournaments, the game is basically cooked except in India.
      Of course the only resolution to a reasoned disagreement is Nets.
      "It's over. It's all over."

      Comment

      • Grantysghost
        Bouncing Strong
        • Apr 2010
        • 18957

        Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

        Originally posted by EasternWest
        Again for the people in the nosebleeds: it's not comparing the wickets it's the application of the rules.
        Theyre different rules, so they are applied differently.
        Fmd.
        For eg in afl. We have a video review for the the goal or behind law.
        We don't for holding the ball.

        Different applications for different rules.

        Maybe I need chat gpt to clear it up for you
        BT COME BACK!​

        Comment

        • mjp
          Bulldog Team of the Century
          • Jan 2007
          • 7363

          Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

          The Carey 'thinking man's act' / dog act depending on your point of view could very well cost England the next test as well if they're not careful.

          The carry on in all levels of media is ridiculous right now and it is as if their captain has forgotten that in order to win a test match you need to take 20-wickets, not one.

          Some genuine soul searching is needed right now not 'anger and fury' about a single dismissal that 100% influenced the result but was hardly the key determinate of the win.
          What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

          Comment

          • Sedat
            Hall of Fame
            • Sep 2007
            • 11243

            Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

            Originally posted by mjp
            The Carey 'thinking man's act' / dog act depending on your point of view could very well cost England the next test as well if they're not careful.

            The carry on in all levels of media is ridiculous right now and it is as if their captain has forgotten that in order to win a test match you need to take 20-wickets, not one.

            Some genuine soul searching is needed right now not 'anger and fury' about a single dismissal that 100% influenced the result but was hardly the key determinate of the win.
            Yep. They have played some really dumb, arrogant cricket at crucial times in the series so far. It's almost like they are trying to prove they will never back down against the arch enemy, and are prepared to fall on their sword as justification for their "method" instead of respecting each ball that is bowled to them. The aggressive approach is fine so long as it is tempered with respect for good balls and, particularly, for the obvious field placings and short ball traps.

            This Bairstow dismissal "furore" will either galvanise them to storm back into the series, or it will make them implode and they lose 5-0. It has definitely gotten the UK public invested in the remainder of the series - expect a very rowdy crowd at Headingley next test (they are uncouth at the best of times).
            "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

            Comment

            • bulldogsthru&thru
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • May 2011
              • 7697

              Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

              Originally posted by jeemak
              The British really do have glass jaws. But of course they'd have withdrawn the appeal if Bairstow had have hit the wickets when he did the exact thing Carey did.

              I actually can't tell if this is a pisstake or if this guy's genuinely excusing the carry on from the old money shitheads in the Long Room.



              Woke Australia? Their cut-throat behaviour sparked death of decorum at Lord?s
              Given it was the age I thought an Australian journalist wrote it. But it's via the Telegraph.

              The guy has said Carey better enlist his own private security for the next test and that he deserves everything that comes his way. Whingeing poms at their worst.

              Comment

              • jeemak
                Bulldog Legend
                • Oct 2010
                • 21814

                Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

                Originally posted by Sedat
                Yep. They have played some really dumb, arrogant cricket at crucial times in the series so far. It's almost like they are trying to prove they will never back down against the arch enemy, and are prepared to fall on their sword as justification for their "method" instead of respecting each ball that is bowled to them. The aggressive approach is fine so long as it is tempered with respect for good balls and, particularly, for the obvious field placings and short ball traps.

                This Bairstow dismissal "furore" will either galvanise them to storm back into the series, or it will make them implode and they lose 5-0. It has definitely gotten the UK public invested in the remainder of the series - expect a very rowdy crowd at Headingley next test (they are uncouth at the best of times).
                I think they'll regret putting up ordinary and relatively lifeless decks. Their pace attack needs as much help as it can get and ours is too solid to expect to offset that by belting the ball around, arrogantly like you say.
                TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

                Comment

                • EasternWest
                  Hall of Fame
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 10002

                  Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

                  Originally posted by Grantysghost
                  Theyre different rules, so they are applied differently.
                  Fmd.
                  For eg in afl. We have a video review for the the goal or behind law.
                  We don't for holding the ball.

                  Different applications for different rules.

                  Maybe I need chat gpt to clear it up for you
                  But they're still rules. That's the end of it.
                  "It's over. It's all over."

                  Comment

                  • macca
                    Coaching Staff
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 2360

                    Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

                    England would be kicking themselves for losing this test match by 43 runs.

                    They really only needed 1 more batmen to make a score.

                    Bairstow should be dropped for his lapse of concentration. Whatever was going through his mind... ??? some heckle donuts... beer ??? who knows ... Regardless if some think its a dismissal or not or in the spirit of the game.

                    Great knock by Stokes, his one of the all time greats. He should just be focus on his batting for longevity.

                    Tongue looks like a real talent, able to move the ball inwards to the left hander, unplayable those dismissals.

                    Comment

                    • Bulldog Joe
                      Premiership Moderator
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 5564

                      Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

                      Ashes test cricket is clearly alive and well.

                      A bit of excitement and crowd interest like this and long form cricket might survive 1 more generation.
                      Life is to be Enjoyed not Endured

                      Comment

                      • lemmon
                        Bulldog Team of the Century
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 6520

                        Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

                        Originally posted by Sedat
                        You know how much I enjoy being a contrarian. No problems whatsoever legally - it's out every day of the week and twice on Sundays. If it was me batting and it was mid-over I'd be dirty at myself for being an idiot. If it was the last ball of the over and I was breathing a sign of relief getting to the end of the over with my wicket still intact, I'd probably approach the keeper like Javed did to Lillee and start a brawl, but that's just me. I completely understand the counter-argument.
                        It's interesting because I feel like Bairstow has more culpability with it being the last ball of the over. It's the only point where the umpire literally calls an auditory signal that the ball has become dead, when calling out 'over'.

                        I reckon every junior cricketer is told 'Don't wander out of your crease until the ump calls over' - it was drilled into my brain that you didn't leave the crease for a garden and a chat until you heard the call. I can see both sides of the argument, but I have no issues with his carelessness being punished (but I also don't have an issue with Mankad, so it's a probably a theme).

                        Comment

                        • jeemak
                          Bulldog Legend
                          • Oct 2010
                          • 21814

                          Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

                          Originally posted by lemmon
                          It's interesting because I feel like Bairstow has more culpability with it being the last ball of the over. It's the only point where the umpire literally calls an auditory signal that the ball has become dead, when calling out 'over'.

                          I reckon every junior cricketer is told 'Don't wander out of your crease until the ump calls over' - it was drilled into my brain that you didn't leave the crease for a garden and a chat until you heard the call. I can see both sides of the argument, but I have no issues with his carelessness being punished (but I also don't have an issue with Mankad, so it's a probably a theme).
                          Countless times you see bats await the "over" call before leaving their crease when the spinners are on and there's people around the bat.
                          TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.

                          Comment

                          • Jasper
                            Senior Player
                            • Jan 2009
                            • 1262

                            Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

                            We know Bairstow couldn't keep sheep in a paddock but he left his own paddock early when batting and paid an appropriate price.
                            If they dont want to drink beers with us after the tests then so be it.
                            Doing my best to use emojis more frequently :o

                            Comment

                            • angelopetraglia
                              Bulldog Team of the Century
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 6838

                              Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

                              We have rules in cricket and then we have the "spirit of the game". There is this cross over when you play within the rules but you are doing something that is borderline unethical.

                              Do we have anything remotely similar in AFL? (e.g. For instance in football, if the opposing team has an injured player when you have possession you kick the ball out of play).

                              I do recall some commentary from Bombers supporters saying that we were "cheating" with the super flood when we beat them in 2000. But I can't remember anything that is remotely similar in AFL.

                              Comment

                              • Grantysghost
                                Bouncing Strong
                                • Apr 2010
                                • 18957

                                Re: ASHES 2023 - 2nd TEST JUNE 28 - JULY 3, LORDS

                                Originally posted by angelopetraglia
                                We have rules in cricket and then we have the "spirit of the game". There is this cross over when you play within the rules but you are doing something that is borderline unethical.

                                Do we have anything remotely similar in AFL? (e.g. For instance in football, if the opposing team has an injured player when you have possession you kick the ball out of play).

                                I do recall some commentary from Bombers supporters saying that we were "cheating" with the super flood when we beat them in 2000. But I can't remember anything that is remotely similar in AFL.
                                Marking contest where you knock a guy out with your knee, he lands between you and the goals.

                                You jump him and slam it through from the goal square then celebrate like you won the flag whilst the trainers try and clear the guys airway.
                                BT COME BACK!​

                                Comment

                                Working...