If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
So explain how Geelong have gone with Dangerfield ? Continuing to top up and tread water . Hawthorn have lost their last 4 finals and does anyone think they’ve got great young talent ? Richmond won their flag on the back of their superstars , whom funnily enough they drafted with early picks .
Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered entertainment destination. Lift your spirits with funny jokes, trending memes, entertaining gifs, inspiring stories, viral videos, and so much more from users.
From a Port fan on Reddit. Posted without comment.
From a Port fan on Reddit. Posted without comment.
It paints an absolutely shocking picture of the man. we'd be bringing him in on a ton of money and it seems like he's a child that refuses to put in the hard yards.
Phew - dodged a bullet there - Wingard thinks he is worth $850k to 1m per season for a flakey flanker who flopped badly when tried out in the midfield. Only worth $600k tops. (Actually probably only worth about $75,000 but AFL salaries are ridiculously inflated compared to their actual worth to society).
I'm not fussed that we missed out on Wingard, but I am puzzled by our approach.
I just don't understand why we needed to even comment.
Hawks didnt feel the need to come out and say they wanted Wingard. They let Wingard do that.
So it seems his general lack of interest in football probably drives the behaviour, and that's fine. However, huge dollars and a lack of interest in maximising physical attributes probably isn't a good mix.
I'd be really interested to see the deals tabled to him compared. A lot of thought goes into this stuff retrospectively, but mostly a pragmatic reason drives the outcomes and I'd be surprised if (though it's not impossible) this didn't come down to a financial and or tenure based decision.
TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.
I'm not sure belittling a two time All Australian that the most successful team in the last 40 years just secured justifies missing out on his services. We wanted him, he's a good player , he chose Hawthorn. How do we become more appealing?
From Sam Landsberg's article we clearly didn't rate him to be worth this year's pick 7.
Next year we are expected to claimb up the ladder. So maybe a pick between 10-15 for him.
The Bulldogs were hoping to use their future first-round pick for Wingard but Port’s preference was to secure their first selection this year, No.7.
We clearly have someone in mind which would keep this year pick 7 for.
Put in a decent year, keep the war chest built up and go after Kelly.
It always seems impossible until it's done. Nelson Mandela
We need to get on the front foot now with a long term offer to Bonti, post haste.
If Wingard doesn't believe in us, I'd love for Bonti and the club to show their commitment to belief in our future.
Comment