Re: North Melbourne
I know about the 10 year rule and it definitely helped North (although it was available to every club - North just used it better), but North did have a pretty strong supporter base in the late 70's to mid 80's. I wonder how much of this was due to the 2 premierships and the Barassi effect? And they continued to have decent support during most of the 80's - due to Krakouer brothers and Friday night footy as I mentioned earlier.
I admired North very much in the 90's because their success was self-made through a fantastic underage pathway system, and they succeeded well beyond other wealthier clubs. But this Carey era success didn't translate to memberships at all (unlike the Barassi era seemed to 20 years earlier).
I know about the 10 year rule and it definitely helped North (although it was available to every club - North just used it better), but North did have a pretty strong supporter base in the late 70's to mid 80's. I wonder how much of this was due to the 2 premierships and the Barassi effect? And they continued to have decent support during most of the 80's - due to Krakouer brothers and Friday night footy as I mentioned earlier.
I admired North very much in the 90's because their success was self-made through a fantastic underage pathway system, and they succeeded well beyond other wealthier clubs. But this Carey era success didn't translate to memberships at all (unlike the Barassi era seemed to 20 years earlier).
Comment