Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Collapse
X
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
We should keep all our picks in the top 50 and only trade if it improves our position. I would like to see us draft 5 new kids in that top 50FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
But boiled down, given McCartney would know him, I would back him either way on this. Same goes for Gumbleton.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
How about recognising he will never be a 'true' key forward and let him play a complimentary role where his natural gifts can be of real benefit too us???
Grant lacks consistency of effort (during games), not size.What should I tell her? She's going to ask.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Awesome. We have a player who has a speed advantage over every opponent he comes up against...therefore we should lock him in a gym and make him stronger, less agile and slower.
How about recognising he will never be a 'true' key forward and let him play a complimentary role where his natural gifts can be of real benefit too us???
Grant lacks consistency of effort (during games), not size.
His speed and good hands are his weapons. I'd just like to see him given a good run at playing close to goal. The way that all of the players invariably work all the way up into defence is very frustrating - but Grant is one who could take advantage of this with his speed getting him free out the back once we get the footy.
When I think of Grant's positives - I think about him taking 4 bounces running away from Collingwood midfielders a couple of years back. We should be using him on the 'fast break' (sorry to use a b'ball term) - and also his speed and hands as an inside 50 leading target IMO.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
I agree with this.
His speed and good hands are his weapons. I'd just like to see him given a good run at playing close to goal. The way that all of the players invariably work all the way up into defence is very frustrating - but Grant is one who could take advantage of this with his speed getting him free out the back once we get the footy.
When I think of Grant's positives - I think about him taking 4 bounces running away from Collingwood midfielders a couple of years back. We should be using him on the 'fast break' (sorry to use a b'ball term) - and also his speed and hands as an inside 50 leading target IMO.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
mjp is spot on.
Not sure why we continually try to make Grant into something he's not.
He does need to improve his effort, but I wish we'd back him in as that quick 'small' forward rather than yell, scream and abuse him for not playing like Hawkins.W00F!Comment
-
But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Perhaps Grant would be better served trying to build an elite tank rather than worrying too much about bulk. This would enable him to play a sort of Nick Riewoldt like role, pushing up the ground and sprinting back into the open fifty and burning off his opponent in the process (not saying he would or could play the same as Riewoldt, only referring to his running patterns).Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
We have so many players of a similar ilk...with Dahlhaus and Griff probably the exceptions. Grant represents a type of player we are in short supply of so rather than give up on him and receive stuff all in return, I would like to see us perservere with him. He has unique attributes.I thought I was wrong once but I was mistaken.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Brad McKenzie is the type of player we should be going for IMO in this draft.
He is from SA and is an elite kick and North are looking for him to play the HB quarterback role.
They were quoted at the time as picking him up as he was the best kick in the draft. He is a bit light on but North have looked at him as a long term prospect. He went with Jack Ziebel over to Colorado to put more time into his physical development whilst Ziebel was suspended during the season.
I dont see him as a wasted pick or a quick fix. In some ways I wish we had picked him up instead of Clay Smith.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Perhaps Grant would be better served trying to build an elite tank rather than worrying too much about bulk. This would enable him to play a sort of Nick Riewoldt like role, pushing up the ground and sprinting back into the open fifty and burning off his opponent in the process (not saying he would or could play the same as Riewoldt, only referring to his running patterns).Western Bulldogs: 2016 PremiersComment
-
But then again, I'm an Internet poster and Bevo is a premiership coach so draw your own conclusions.Comment
Comment