Re: Starting to get worried about our coach
I think he's maintained a pretty even approach. I've not enjoyed a lot of our football but he's taken a development approach, and it was needed. We need to remember how poor we were last year. Sure, we didn't have a patch perhaps as bad as the last 5 weeks, but we were pretty woeful for a lot of the year.
Playing the three ruck men has been evidence of the development approach, and I've been supportive of this. There is only so many years we could have Roughie and Cordy on the list without playing them. After the North Melbourne game it seemed to be coming together, but we've hit some rough waters since.
I don't have any problem with his contest out approach. Even under Eade in his best years we could't produce the intensity required for long enough, and often over relied on our offensive ability. Whilst a player like Shermans value should be in his run and carry, I have no problem with Macca taking a hard line in demanding an improved defensive contribution etc. Sure as a team we've struggled to get the balance right between attacking and defending, but surely the lack of experienced forwards (post-Hall) is a massive factor in this. And all of us would agree that for us to be good we need to establish if Jones, Grant, Cordy and Roughie are part of the future.
The problem, and its an inherited one is the list. We just have too many unestablished players and too many fringe/depth players who have yet to distinguish themselves.
I think he's maintained a pretty even approach. I've not enjoyed a lot of our football but he's taken a development approach, and it was needed. We need to remember how poor we were last year. Sure, we didn't have a patch perhaps as bad as the last 5 weeks, but we were pretty woeful for a lot of the year.
Playing the three ruck men has been evidence of the development approach, and I've been supportive of this. There is only so many years we could have Roughie and Cordy on the list without playing them. After the North Melbourne game it seemed to be coming together, but we've hit some rough waters since.
I don't have any problem with his contest out approach. Even under Eade in his best years we could't produce the intensity required for long enough, and often over relied on our offensive ability. Whilst a player like Shermans value should be in his run and carry, I have no problem with Macca taking a hard line in demanding an improved defensive contribution etc. Sure as a team we've struggled to get the balance right between attacking and defending, but surely the lack of experienced forwards (post-Hall) is a massive factor in this. And all of us would agree that for us to be good we need to establish if Jones, Grant, Cordy and Roughie are part of the future.
The problem, and its an inherited one is the list. We just have too many unestablished players and too many fringe/depth players who have yet to distinguish themselves.
Comment