Talking trades

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sockeye Salmon
    Bulldog Team of the Century
    • Jan 2007
    • 6365

    #46
    Re: Talking trades

    Is he free agency?

    If we were to pick him up and lose Minson, the AFL will call it all square and we wouldn't get any compo for Minson.

    Comment

    • LostDoggy
      WOOF Member
      • Jan 2007
      • 8307

      #47
      Re: Talking trades

      No for Byrne. What are we, a dumping ground for Geelong rejects? For an ageing team like Geelong I would have thought a speedy player like Byrne is required so it says how good he is not playing.

      Comment

      • azabob
        Hall of Fame
        • Sep 2008
        • 15335

        #48
        Re: Talking trades

        Originally posted by GVGjr
        I've had a bit of a browse for this but can't find this. I don't see him as being exactly what we need at the moment but he's a good player.
        I have found the posts, it was only two posters and perhaps I wasn't exactly shouted down.

        I still think he could add something for us.

        More of an In Bruges guy?

        Comment

        • GVGjr
          Moderator
          • Nov 2006
          • 44721

          #49
          Re: Talking trades

          Originally posted by azabob
          I have found the posts, it was only two posters and perhaps I wasn't exactly shouted down.

          I still think he could add something for us.

          http://www.woof.net.au/forum/showthr...+Byrnes&page=2
          No problems, I did see that and I didn't think it was a bollocking.

          There are a lot of players that could add something to us and in my opinion Byrnes could do that but given our current list if we are to trade for players they either need to be capable of sneaking into our 10 or filling a specific need. I don't think Byrnes quite does that.
          Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

          Comment

          • ledge
            Hall of Fame
            • Dec 2007
            • 14348

            #50
            Re: Talking trades

            Originally posted by GVGjr
            No problems, I did see that and I didn't think it was a bollocking.

            There are a lot of players that could add something to us and in my opinion Byrnes could do that but given our current list if we are to trade for players they either need to be capable of sneaking into our 10 or filling a specific need. I don't think Byrnes quite does that.
            I know every player is different but I tend to agree with chops on this, Geelong must lick its lips every year when they want to get something for a player they are going to delist. They just ring us and offer them up and we take them.
            Robbins was an awesome get though, was he to blame for the continuing deals?
            Bring back the biff

            Comment

            • Topdog
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jan 2007
              • 7471

              #51
              Re: Talking trades

              With ledge and Chops. A 28 y.o that has managed 9 games in his last 2 years is the definition of a list clogger. If he were 23 I'd consider it and probably still say no but at 28 the discussion doesn't even start IMO

              Comment

              • The Pie Man
                Coaching Staff
                • May 2008
                • 3497

                #52
                Re: Talking trades

                Byrnes is ok, but we're nowhere near where we'd need to be to consider a top up player like him.
                Float Along - Fill Your Lungs

                Comment

                • ledge
                  Hall of Fame
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 14348

                  #53
                  Re: Talking trades

                  Originally posted by Topdog
                  With ledge and Chops. A 28 y.o that has managed 9 games in his last 2 years is the definition of a list clogger. If he were 23 I'd consider it and probably still say no but at 28 the discussion doesn't even start IMO
                  Didn't realise he was 28 that pretty much seals the decision for me
                  Bring back the biff

                  Comment

                  • Dancin' Douggy
                    WOOF Member
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 2876

                    #54
                    Re: Talking trades

                    Originally posted by Chops
                    No for Byrne. What are we, a dumping ground for Geelong rejects? For an ageing team like Geelong I would have thought a speedy player like Byrne is required so it says how good he is not playing.
                    Have to agree with Chops. Nothing to see here, move along.

                    Comment

                    • Mofra
                      Hall of Fame
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 14984

                      #55
                      Re: Talking trades

                      Isn't Byrne all but assured of a spot with the Demons?
                      Agreement in principle is a rumour doing the rounds.
                      Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                      Comment

                      • Topdog
                        Bulldog Team of the Century
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 7471

                        #56
                        Re: Talking trades

                        Would be a very silly move by the Demons

                        Comment

                        • azabob
                          Hall of Fame
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 15335

                          #57
                          Re: Talking trades

                          Originally posted by Mofra
                          Isn't Byrne all but assured of a spot with the Demons?
                          Agreement in principle is a rumour doing the rounds.
                          Supposedly, but Monfreies was also rumoured to be signing with the demons also.
                          More of an In Bruges guy?

                          Comment

                          • mjp
                            Bulldog Team of the Century
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 7382

                            #58
                            Re: Talking trades

                            Originally posted by Topdog
                            Would be a very silly move by the Demons
                            Why?

                            He isn't the worst player going around - sure, Stokes and Christensen are ahead of him but that is OK. Melbourne need someone at the feet of Mitch Clarke (?spelling) and if they don't think they have anyone what is wrong with getting someone who might be able to do it?

                            He is 28, not 38. If he can play, he can play. He wont cost the earth and - as a fa - wont even cost a late draft pick. It is ok to try and win games and kick goals whilst you try to rebuild.
                            What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

                            Comment

                            • Mofra
                              Hall of Fame
                              • Dec 2006
                              • 14984

                              #59
                              Re: Talking trades

                              Originally posted by azabob
                              Supposedly, but Monfreies was also rumoured to be signing with the demons also.
                              Linked to Richmond too - first end of season FA period looks set to be very interesting
                              Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                              Comment

                              • mjp
                                Bulldog Team of the Century
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 7382

                                #60
                                Re: Talking trades

                                Originally posted by Mofra
                                Linked to Richmond too - first end of season FA period looks set to be very interesting
                                I honestly believe there is going to be a club or two that is just more 'ready' for this than anyone else and will take advantage. North did it 30 years ago with the 10 year rule and whether what they did was 'honest' or otherwise they have 2 flags in the trophy case because of it.

                                You could just see a club like Hawthorn pinching Minson, Monfries and Chaplin and really solidifying their position whilst everyone else 'does it the right way' and builds through the draft.
                                What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

                                Comment

                                Working...