Talking trades

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cyberdoggie
    WOOF Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 2859

    Re: Talking trades

    Hawthorn got him for a steal really.

    Trading a 28 year old in Gilham who is coming off an ACL, picking up Anderson plus slight downgrad in their picks.

    Bargain.

    Comment

    • Cyberdoggie
      WOOF Member
      • Jan 2007
      • 2859

      Re: Talking trades

      Originally posted by Sedat
      Hawks are getting the slightly downgraded picks in that deal so maybe it was GWS that was posturing
      I read it the other way, confusing the draft tracker format.

      Still a good bargain for the hawks i think.

      Comment

      • Bornadog
        WOOF Clubhouse Leader
        • Jan 2007
        • 66859

        Re: Talking trades

        Originally posted by Twodogs
        Yeah. Dalrymple will sigh and cross another name off his list. That's Martin, Hogan and Anderson gone now.
        We had no hope of getting Hogan or Martin and we don't know whether we had any interest in Anderson.
        FFC: Established 1883

        Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

        Comment

        • Missing Dog
          WOOF Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 8501

          Re: Talking trades

          Originally posted by bornadog
          We had no hope of getting Hogan or Martin and we don't know whether we had any interest in Anderson.
          According to Emma Quayle we were interested in Anderson.

          Comment

          • Bornadog
            WOOF Clubhouse Leader
            • Jan 2007
            • 66859

            Re: Talking trades

            Originally posted by bulldogsman
            According to Emma Quayle we were interested in Anderson.
            Oh well, one fail

            (excluding Dawes and Gumbleton )
            FFC: Established 1883

            Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

            Comment

            • Bulldog Revolution
              Coaching Staff
              • Dec 2006
              • 3928

              Re: Talking trades

              Originally posted by bornadog
              31 trades completed - record is 33 in 2000 and will be broken.
              It slowed down after you posted this didn't it

              Comment

              • Bornadog
                WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                • Jan 2007
                • 66859

                Re: Talking trades

                Originally posted by Bulldog Revolution
                It slowed down after you posted this didn't it
                I think at least 6 more after that
                FFC: Established 1883

                Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                Comment

                • Bulldog Revolution
                  Coaching Staff
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 3928

                  Re: Talking trades

                  Originally posted by bornadog
                  I think at least 6 more after that
                  Fair enough, felt like it slowed down more than I thought it would

                  I expected Tippett, Brown etc to be traded

                  Comment

                  • azabob
                    Hall of Fame
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 15337

                    Re: Talking trades

                    Originally posted by Bulldog Revolution
                    Fair enough, felt like it slowed down more than I thought it would

                    I expected Tippett, Brown etc to be traded
                    It seems like the AFL wouldn't have approved the Tippett trade due to all the shonky deals between him and the crows.
                    More of an In Bruges guy?

                    Comment

                    • Sockeye Salmon
                      Bulldog Team of the Century
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 6365

                      Re: Talking trades

                      Originally posted by bulldogsman
                      According to Emma Quayle we were interested in Anderson.
                      GWS wanted a big defender, surely they would have preferred Markovic over Gilham?

                      Comment

                      • Missing Dog
                        WOOF Member
                        • Jan 2007
                        • 8501

                        Re: Talking trades

                        Originally posted by Sockeye Salmon
                        GWS wanted a big defender, surely they would have preferred Markovic over Gilham?
                        Maybe we didn't want to let go of Markovic after losing Lake?

                        Comment

                        • Bornadog
                          WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 66859

                          Re: Talking trades

                          Originally posted by Chops
                          Am I right in saying Hawthorn got rid of 3 defenders (Gilham, Murphy and Young), 2 of them tallish after we traded them Lake?
                          Just highlights how badly we were dudded there.
                          Not sure what you mean?

                          Gilham - Injury prone and couldn't get a game this year.

                          Murphy - average at best, couldn't make two GF teams

                          Young - Free Agent and got a better deal.
                          FFC: Established 1883

                          Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                          Comment

                          • Sedat
                            Hall of Fame
                            • Sep 2007
                            • 11279

                            Re: Talking trades

                            Originally posted by bornadog
                            Not sure what you mean?

                            Gilham - Injury prone and couldn't get a game this year.

                            Murphy - average at best, couldn't make two GF teams

                            Young - Free Agent and got a better deal.
                            Meaning they were desperate for a real key defender, not the imposters masquerading as key defenders on their list (ie: Shoey, Gilham, Murphy). And because they were desperate for one, we gave them Lake far too easily - I don't think that is in any doubt in AFL circles that we gave him away for unders (even if quite a few posters here, as is their right, are happy as larry with the Lake trade).
                            "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

                            Comment

                            • Throughandthrough
                              Coaching Staff
                              • Nov 2007
                              • 3201

                              Re: Talking trades

                              Originally posted by Chops
                              Am I right in saying Hawthorn got rid of 3 defenders (Gilham, Murphy and Young), 2 of them tallish after we traded them Lake?
                              Just highlights how badly we were dudded there.


                              How does that make any sense at all?

                              Obviously Hawthorn thought Lake was a better option then what they allready had or they wouldnt have taken him.

                              Comment

                              • Bornadog
                                WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 66859

                                Re: Talking trades

                                Originally posted by Sedat
                                Meaning they were desperate for a real key defender, not the imposters masquerading as key defenders on their list (ie: Shoey, Gilham, Murphy). And because they were desperate for one, we gave them Lake far too easily - I don't think that is in any doubt in AFL circles that we gave him away for unders (even if quite a few posters here, as is their right, are happy as larry with the Lake trade).
                                Originally posted by Chops
                                That's is my point. If Hawthorn rated him so why didn't we wait out and get a better deal? Don't care if our club didn't rate him or he was going to leave next year for nothing, he was worth more than we got for him.
                                The no sense part is what we did in the deal.
                                We are only guessing we would have had a better deal. Anyway its done now so we move on to the next phase.
                                FFC: Established 1883

                                Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                                Comment

                                Working...