ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LostDoggy
    WOOF Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 8307

    Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

    Ahmed Saad deserves an OAM or something similar. In this timeframe he has been 'convicted', served his suspension and now come back to the AFL for a second chance.

    Comment

    • Bornadog
      WOOF Clubhouse Leader
      • Jan 2007
      • 66700

      Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

      Originally posted by M.R.M
      Ahmed Saad deserves an OAM or something similar. In this timeframe he has been 'convicted', served his suspension and now come back to the AFL for a second chance.
      and that is what should have happened at Essendon. They should have fessed up at the start instead of denying everything. They could have won the PR war as well by saying yes we had a programme in place, we were advised the supplements were legal so we went ahead, now let's discuss a deal.
      FFC: Established 1883

      Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

      Comment

      • LostDoggy
        WOOF Member
        • Jan 2007
        • 8307

        Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

        Look below
        Last edited by LostDoggy; 06-02-2015, 11:12 AM. Reason: I'm a luddite

        Comment

        • LostDoggy
          WOOF Member
          • Jan 2007
          • 8307

          Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

          Originally posted by M.R.M
          Ahmed Saad deserves an OAM or something similar. In this timeframe he has been 'convicted', served his suspension and now come back to the AFL for a second chance.
          I bet Tony wishes he gave him Sir Prince Phillip's knighthood!

          Comment

          • Sedat
            Hall of Fame
            • Sep 2007
            • 11245

            Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players



            If the AFL had any balls they would simply call Essendon's bluff and replace them with the winner of the Foxtel Cup last year. I'm heartily sick and tired of this wretched club dragging the rest of the competition down in the sewers with them. This is my favourite bit from the article:

            "Every listed Essendon player from 2012 would be allowed to withdraw from all 2015 pre-season games under an AFL proposal that would help hide the identities of Bombers players charged with taking performance-enhancing drugs.

            But the Bombers have baulked at the suggested compromise, citing health and safety concerns as both parties worked desperately to reach a solution to the NAB Challenge dilemma. The AFL solution would leave Essendon with an estimated 18 senior and rookie-listed players, with one-third of those currently unavailable in rehabilitation or restricted training."


            Let's ponder this for a moment - Essendon are all of a sudden concerned about health and safety issues with burdening younger players to play extended minutes in a pissant pre-season practice match, but they had no such issues or concerns about injecting almost the entire list for 2 seasons with a cocktail of performance enhancing drugs (some of which weren't even approved for human consumption) without specifically knowing exactly what junk they injected into their players. It's almost getting to the stage now where they need to be cut adrift from the competition and have their license revoked.
            "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

            Comment

            • westdog54
              Bulldog Team of the Century
              • Jan 2007
              • 6686

              Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

              Seriously getting sick and tired of Essendon's attitude around the follow on issues that have arisen from the drugs saga.

              They don't seem to get the fact that under the rules the 34 players are provisionally suspended. That's a rule.

              The AFL have offered up a perfectly sensible solution that protects the identity of the players involved as well as protects the integrity of the competition, but it doesn't seem to suit Essendon's needs.

              It has been Essendon's call to have the player's names kept secret throughout this process. No-one elses. Even our two affected players have been prepared to break ranks.

              They can't have it both ways. Either stand the players down so that they're effectively already serving any possible suspension or run the gauntlet. Anything else is continuing to insult the rest of the competition.

              Comment

              • bulldogtragic
                The List Manager
                • Jan 2007
                • 34289

                Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

                The AFL seem willing to be made to look weak and inept. Just make a decision and let Essendon deal with it. When courts jail a convicted person they don't spend weeks pondering if the prisoner will partake in work or exercise programs, or whether because they don't like white bread there should be a special order of multigrain or whether to order an extra TV because some inmates prefer to watch one show over another.

                Just make the decision, stand by it and let them understand the circumstance is of their making and they can deal with it...
                Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

                Comment

                • Dancin' Douggy
                  WOOF Member
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 2876

                  Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

                  Essendon disgust me.

                  Comment

                  • Twodogs
                    Moderator
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 27654

                    Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

                    Even more so than usual for me.


                    Dis-gust.
                    They say Burt Lancaster has one, but I don't believe them.

                    Comment

                    • Bornadog
                      WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 66700

                      Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

                      Essendon 34 won't play in NAB Challenge

                      FFC: Established 1883

                      Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                      Comment

                      • GVGjr
                        Moderator
                        • Nov 2006
                        • 44634

                        Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

                        Does any one else think Essendon are going to get off this?

                        They are guilty in the eyes of many but the evidence just can't be conclusive enough.
                        Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                        Comment

                        • LostDoggy
                          WOOF Member
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 8307

                          Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

                          Originally posted by GVGjr
                          Does any one else think Essendon are going to get off this?

                          They are guilty in the eyes of many but the evidence just can't be conclusive enough.
                          Yep, and their fans will bleat like stubborn pigs for the next three decades.

                          Comment

                          • Sedat
                            Hall of Fame
                            • Sep 2007
                            • 11245

                            Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

                            Originally posted by GVGjr
                            Does any one else think Essendon are going to get off this?

                            They are guilty in the eyes of many but the evidence just can't be conclusive enough.
                            I'm thinking the contrary, that they know they're completely stuffed. It is a folorn hope that there is not definitive evidence linking the club and players to banned PED's.
                            "Look at me mate. Look at me. I'm flyin'"

                            Comment

                            • GVGjr
                              Moderator
                              • Nov 2006
                              • 44634

                              Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

                              Originally posted by Sedat
                              I'm thinking the contrary, that they know they're completely stuffed. It is a folorn hope that there is not definitive evidence linking the club and players to banned PED's.
                              So what is the likely penalty? Losing games in the NAB cup isn't going to cover it.

                              Since the Melbourne tanking compromise I'm not sure how hard the AFL wants to push this
                              Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

                              Comment

                              • westdog54
                                Bulldog Team of the Century
                                • Jan 2007
                                • 6686

                                Re: ASADA issues show-cause notices to Essendon players

                                Originally posted by GVGjr
                                Does any one else think Essendon are going to get off this?

                                They are guilty in the eyes of many but the evidence just can't be conclusive enough.
                                Not for a second. This isn't a Criminal Court. A decision will be made on Balance of Probability.

                                Comment

                                Working...