Tribunal / suspensions 2024
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Re: Tribunal / suspensions 2024
What the MRO/ tribunal might argue is that West was attacking the contest in a similar way that rightfully earned him his most recent suspension. They'd say he's a player who needs to learn from previous risky behaviours, without dealing with each individual instance on its merits.
It's a silly way of going about things, but it's a justification for borderline decisions by the MRO/ tribunal that's been used before.TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.Comment
-
Re: Tribunal / suspensions 2024
Is there any chance they just decide mid season to scrap the "fairest" part of the award, seeing as it isn't really relevant.
It would be arrogantly unprofessional, which is right up the AFL's alley, and the alternative is not much better when they find a way to not suspend Reid for something they have clearly defined as suspendable.
Honestly they'd probably see the "content" the move generates as a good thing, especially as it can be framed as the AFL scrapping an outdated rule, and every media outlet is going to immediately jump to the next line about how fantastic it is that Reid and Darcy, the clear frontrunners and indisputably rising stars, will still be able to battle it out.I should leave it alone but you're not rightComment
-
Re: Tribunal / suspensions 2024
The silver lining here is that Darcy will end up having a more impressive season and won't get ripped at the finish line by the sycophantic judging and media cabal that ****ed Bont over in 2014.
What he's doing as an early game 208cm player is next level good and everything as impressive as Harley Reid's start, but I reckon he won't fatigue in the last ten games of the season like Reid could meaning he may play out the season better.
Question - like the Brownlow do players still get rising star votes for their efforts in season or do they get excluded from panel judging altogether?TF is this?.........Obviously you're not a golfer.Comment
-
Re: Tribunal / suspensions 2024
The silver lining here is that Darcy will end up having a more impressive season and won't get ripped at the finish line by the sycophantic judging and media cabal that ****ed Bont over in 2014.
What he's doing as an early game 208cm player is next level good and everything as impressive as Harley Reid's start, but I reckon he won't fatigue in the last ten games of the season like Reid could meaning he may play out the season better.
Question - like the Brownlow do players still get rising star votes for their efforts in season or do they get excluded from panel judging altogether?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Comment
-
Re: Tribunal / suspensions 2024
What the MRO/ tribunal might argue is that West was attacking the contest in a similar way that rightfully earned him his most recent suspension. They'd say he's a player who needs to learn from previous risky behaviours, without dealing with each individual instance on its merits.
It's a silly way of going about things, but it's a justification for borderline decisions by the MRO/ tribunal that's been used before.
The reason I ask is that it looks like West initially makes contact with another player (Maynard?) first before making the contact with the other player. I'd like to see the full goalie camera version- but it looks like he bounces off one player into the other.
Not that I think it is suspendible anyway, but it is weird why they don' just show the whole incident in the closest up view of it.Comment
-
Re: Tribunal / suspensions 2024
If Darcy gets suspended are we saying that any player who cannons into a players back (ie marking contest) is at risk if that player hits their head?
There are the legit marking contests when a player gets laid out and there are also a plethora of "unrealistic attempt" style ones that end up ironing out a player. Surely the latter has got to be suspendible if the player they have ridden falls forward and hits their head? What about the ones where they drive their knees through a players head and knock them out (ie Cordy in the 2016 Prelim)?
Edit: I think he should probably get a suspension- but the grading is confusing seeing he doesn't make contact with the head. I think it should also put the "unrealistic" marking attempts on notice.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Tribunal / suspensions 2024
Given Harley is the unbackable favourite for the Rising Star award, I am sure he will get a "get out of jail free" card from the AFL I wonder if we will argue Sam's case in order to try to get a reduction in the sentence. Perhaps we need to engage Carlton's lawyers, they are always pretty adept in having verdicts overthrown.Life is to be Enjoyed not EnduredComment
-
Re: Tribunal / suspensions 2024
Would it be worth an appeal just to get it downgraded to 1 week. Not saying its not worth a report but the wording of it.Don't piss off old people
The older we get the less "LIFE IN PRISON" is a deterrent...Comment
-
Re: Tribunal / suspensions 2024
The silver lining here is that Darcy will end up having a more impressive season and won't get ripped at the finish line by the sycophantic judging and media cabal that ****ed Bont over in 2014.
What he's doing as an early game 208cm player is next level good and everything as impressive as Harley Reid's start, but I reckon he won't fatigue in the last ten games of the season like Reid could meaning he may play out the season better.
Question - like the Brownlow do players still get rising star votes for their efforts in season or do they get excluded from panel judging altogether?Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Tribunal / suspensions 2024
As long as we can win the next two without him , we need to get to 8-6 then we are in a very good position.Bring back the biffComment
-
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
Comment