Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
That is the issue, isn't it? In twenty years time Barlow will be content in knowing he gave it the best shot he could, whereas Everitt, Hill perhaps will wonder what if.....
Granted Barlow may not be good enough to make it but he won't die wondering.More of an In Bruges guy?Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Seriously, Barlow is an absolute spud. We don't have to upgrade him, his depth will still be provided on the rookie list. Lets leave him there.- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
a) They are clearly in you best 25 the coming year (ie. Dahlhaus)
or
b) You have run out of years to keep them on the rookie list (max 3) and while they still do not fall in the best 25 category, they are better than the player you expect to get with the draft pick their spot is currently allocated to, and they have the potential to be in that 25 ("b" as an option should hardly ever be used). This player should be on a one year contract, so they are effectively a rookie on the senior list.
Under this theory Mulligan and Hooper wouldn't have been promoted, but kept as rookies. If their form was good enough this year they would have been promoted, if not then we just don't retain them, which if they weren't signed up for 2012 would probably be what would happen anyway.I should leave it alone but you're not rightComment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Some like to do it now- like gold coast have already started. If your club was smart you would wait till after the trade window as sometimes one mans trash is another treasure.More of an In Bruges guy?Comment
-
Bring back the biffComment
-
Comment
-
Bring back the biffComment
-
FFC: Established 1883
Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Didn't we allow Gilbee to show he could fight his way back in our best 22 this year? From my recollection he was on the decline last year and we all put it down to a bad season and as a club we allowed him to play on this year on the basis he was not a guranteed starter and would have to earn his spot in the side. His form has been on the decline for two seasons now, his main asset which is his kicking isn't what it used to be and I struggle to find where he sits in our plans for the future. Despite a strong preseason he still wasn't able to consolidate his spot in our team and ended the year in our reserves, what I don't understand is why he would still have another year on his contract when his decline wasn't unexpected in fact this has been on the cards for the past 24 months.
IIRC he was dropped 2 weeks after kicking a bag of goals...
Might be a spot to try him back in next year where his exceptional kicking might slot some handy goals?Comment
Comment