Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
The three mentioned above could be possibilities for GWS although it would be debateable if they would entertain all three.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Does anyone know whether the player list numbers for clubs reduce by 2 next year? I had heard something a while back but can't find anything to confirm it.[COLOR="Red"][B][U][COLOR="Blue"]85, 92, 97, 98, 08, 09, 10... Break the curse![/COLOR][/U][/B][/COLOR]Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Haven't heard anythign about it TBHWestern Bulldogs: 2016 PremiersComment
-
Comment
-
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
I had another look at the Brennan trade last year. The Lions agreed to GC signing a 2nd player. The Lions received a 2nd compo pick as well as trading picks with GC. So in effect GC and Brisbane did a trade and exploited the compo system to get something for free.
We can use this loop hole for Sam Reid. GWS give us whatever and then we get the AFL compo on top of that (doesn't really take anything away from GWS).Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
I had another look at the Brennan trade last year. The Lions agreed to GC signing a 2nd player. The Lions received a 2nd compo pick as well as trading picks with GC. So in effect GC and Brisbane did a trade and exploited the compo system to get something for free.
We can use this loop hole for Sam Reid. GWS give us whatever and then we get the AFL compo on top of that (doesn't really take anything away from GWS).Western Bulldogs: 2016 PremiersComment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
We are not forced to do anything here. GWS trade a pick to us for Reid and then we get the compo pick on top of it. No skin off GWS' nose as they won't be paying for it.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Lake on the footy show, didn't say anything comprehensive. Said he didn't know if he would be at the dogs next year, but he implied as long as we don't want to move him, he'll be there.
Didn't sound like he was too happy with Monty's comments around the middle of the year, and apparently, other than his outward comments, so there was no discussion with Lake before of after.Last edited by LostDoggy; 15-09-2011, 11:25 PM.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
I thought Lake looked terribly unhappy.
The new coach may have to convince him to stay based on what I saw/interpreted.W00F!Comment
Comment