Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Collapse
X
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
I'm not making that call but come the end of the season I think we need to have a good look if we have the time and the resources to continue to develop him and if he can make that step.
If the team was traveling better then people have heaps of patience so given our performance to date it's no surprise that a lot of the fringe players are under more scrutiny than the last few seasons. I acknowledge the points you have raised but we still have to ask the question if he is worth it. It's early days but I think it's a question that needs to be asked at the end of the season.
For all those Skinner deriders; Did they watch him on the weekend? He was at the very least, competitive.
There were a lot worse players on the field.
Distinctive as a player, fans are pretty quick to jump on his back. Perhaps it's the fans fault for being unrealistic with their expectations? May not make it to AFL level? maybe. Too early to tell? definitely.
Hawks had pick 2 and 5, Richmond 1 and 4. Bulldogs 3.Last edited by Ghost Dog; 10-06-2012, 08:59 PM.You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― EpicurusComment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
We have 5 picks in the first 3 rounds. I would have both Austin and Campbell clearly ahead of Skinner for a spot on the senior list. Of course we would ideally keep the pair on the rookie list but ideally we would have everyone on the minimum wage. Instead of thinking of it as the rookie list, we should think of it as the conditions we are offering them. A one-year contract for $60-70k and you're only a chance to pay a game if someone gets injured for 8+ weeks. I think the pair are almost guaranteed to get an offer to join a senior list.
That means 7 picks. When it comes to delistings, I think about whether I would be interested in the play if they were Williamstown listed. If that was the case with Panos and Skinner, would we want the club to draft them? I think they are rookie draft picks at best.
Gilbee, Mulligan, Moles and Hooper are gone. That means one more player. I would let Shaggy decided whether he wants to stay around for a year. Really not sure who would go if Shaggy decides to stay on. Perhaps trade 2 picks for an upgrade.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
I don't have the stats for the box hill game yet but if it was on average this year, it would be about 8 possessions at vfl level.
Is that competitive because I'd be surprised if he got many more than 5 yesterday.
Why do need to believe in something that simply isn't there?Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Yes Redpath was worse. Not many others.
I don't have the stats for the box hill game yet but if it was on average this year, it would be about 5 possessions.
Is that competitive because I'd be surprised if he got many more than 5 yesterday.
Why do need to believe in something that simply isn't there?You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― EpicurusComment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Absolutely. He needs to get on with it.
For all those Skinner deriders; Did they watch him on the weekend? He was at the very least, competitive.
There were a lot worse players on the field.
Distinctive as a player, fans are pretty quick to jump on his back. Perhaps it's the fans fault for being unrealistic with their expectations? May not make it to AFL level? maybe. Too early to tell? definitely.
This year (not counting yesterday as the stats aren't up) he has 4 goals for the year and is averaging 7.8 touches a game.
That is pathetic by any measure.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Funny thing is, he is viewed more kindly than most 2 year players yet he is already 22. I'd try and re-draft him as a rookie.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Indigenous people have a history of steep hills to climb and lots of us are behind you. Think you have something special to add to the team.You don't develop courage by being happy in your relationships every day. You develop it by surviving difficult times and challenging adversity. ― EpicurusComment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
Stick at it Zephi. The key forward is one of the toughest gigs in the game. In the same way that a lot of people said Cordy would never make it, you have a window and just stick to your guns keep at it.
Indigenous people have a history of steep hills to climb and lots of us are behind you. Think you have something special to add to the team.
I think Cordy is different for 3 main reasons:
- always had at least one clear role he he could play at highest level. Skinner doesn't. Not strong enough to be a KP and his fitness means he can't be a small/medium type.
- Ayce is a year younger.
- Cordy 11 > Zeph 12, meaning he is at least 2 years ahead in development.
You're a fan and that's fair enough. I hope you are right. I am not saying just dump him btw, I think he fits the rookie list.Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
GD, you really are blinded by what the club does/throws out in the media.
It is ridiculous that Skinner is on the senior list of an AFL club. We picked him because we thought Collingwood were interested in him. I don't call that astute drafting.
If he's lucky he may be rookied.W00F!Comment
-
Re: Retirements, Trades, Delistings and the Rookie list
I laughed.
GD, you really are blinded by what the club does/throws out in the media.
It is ridiculous that Skinner is on the senior list of an AFL club. We picked him because we thought Collingwood were interested in him. I don't call that astute drafting.
If he's lucky he may be rookied.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment