Re: 2019 Draft Watch
I'd think they'd have a best available player in mind. We traded for needs really well this year, taking the best available at our pick is probably a good place to start, but I don't think the club has called out any type of player we might need but happy to be corrected on that.
If we end up getting someone who plays in a position we already have cover in it's not a big deal. The reality is that not every top draftee is a freak like Smith and can play a full season after a half a preseason, which is why I wouldn't be too worried if we picked up Gould. Such is the profile of our list that anyone we pick can pretty much develop in the twos and not have a great deal of pressure placed on them to immediately step up. But, if they do step up then it's a bonus and we worry about having a glut of players who are talented at the end of next year and the year after.
Exciting times, I don't see how our list couldn't be considered as one of the most promising for 2020.
I'd think they'd have a best available player in mind. We traded for needs really well this year, taking the best available at our pick is probably a good place to start, but I don't think the club has called out any type of player we might need but happy to be corrected on that.
If we end up getting someone who plays in a position we already have cover in it's not a big deal. The reality is that not every top draftee is a freak like Smith and can play a full season after a half a preseason, which is why I wouldn't be too worried if we picked up Gould. Such is the profile of our list that anyone we pick can pretty much develop in the twos and not have a great deal of pressure placed on them to immediately step up. But, if they do step up then it's a bonus and we worry about having a glut of players who are talented at the end of next year and the year after.
Exciting times, I don't see how our list couldn't be considered as one of the most promising for 2020.
Comment