2025 List Management Thread

[Mitcha]

Josh Jenkins is even less relevant than Cornes. Have no interest in eithers opinion on anything.

[JanLorMill]

Remember Jenkins is more known for causing the commentary term change of Joe the goose to Josh the goose.

[Willow18]

Jenkins clearly forgetting how good Treloar was just 12 months ago

[GVGjr]

Jenkins clearly forgetting how good Treloar was just 12 months ago

While its not an exact science our medical team should know if Treloar can get through another season.

[Mantis]

Jenkins clearly forgetting how good Treloar was just 12 months ago

Or just being realistic to the point that the game moves fast and whilst Treloar had a terrific 2024, he's had about 5 calf injuries since he's played a meaningful game.

I love Adam's story, but it's time to move on if we are to improve as a team.

[doggies ftw]

Or just being realistic to the point that the game moves fast and whilst Treloar had a terrific 2024, he's had about 5 calf injuries since he's played a meaningful game.

I love Adam's story, but it's time to move on if we are to improve as a team.

Is there really any downside to carrying Treloar on the list next year? I can find 5+ players pretty quickly who I’d prefer to cut. If Treloar only plays 10 games and helps set standards and develop some of the kids (ie has a great relationship with Sanders) is that really worth nothing? Hell to be honest even if he plays 0 games he’d still offer more than some others on the list.

I just don’t see an issue here, there’s more chance of Treloar getting his body right and playing some good footy next year than there is of Poulter not being scared of his own shadow, or Coffield outrunning a tree. Plenty of options to cut first

[hujsh]

Johnno seemed impervious to the effect of time until he got that first calf injury. I'm expecting nothing from Treloar next year

[Axe Man]

Johnno seemed impervious to the effect of time until he got that first calf injury. I'm expecting nothing from Treloar next year

I guess the difference with Treloar is that he has had significant soft tissue injuries in the past that he has overcome and clearly they were not age related. That and he hasn't been run over by any golf carts that I am aware of.

Whether this time has just been bad luck or age catching up is a question for the medicos I suppose.

[Mofra]

I guess the difference with Treloar is that he has had significant soft tissue injuries in the past that he has overcome and clearly they were not age related. That and he hasn't been run over by any golf carts that I am aware of.

Whether this time has just been bad luck or age catching up is a question for the medicos I suppose.

I think Treloar is quite the positive mentor for young players too and he'd be worth keeping on the list for one more year for that alone.

[Mantis]

Is there really any downside to carrying Treloar on the list next year? I can find 5+ players pretty quickly who I’d prefer to cut. If Treloar only plays 10 games and helps set standards and develop some of the kids (ie has a great relationship with Sanders) is that really worth nothing? Hell to be honest even if he plays 0 games he’d still offer more than some others on the list.

I just don’t see an issue here, there’s more chance of Treloar getting his body right and playing some good footy next year than there is of Poulter not being scared of his own shadow, or Coffield outrunning a tree. Plenty of options to cut first

Whilst I'm in agreeance that we probably have some ''dead wood'' on the list, the differences are that those players are already contracted for next year and are probably not in competition with Adam for a spot in the team given they play completely different roles

Our midfield has played an overly aggressive style over the past number of years, and I would hope that gets addressed this off-season, and in doing do we move past players who don't work both ways... which makes Adam's inability to move an issue.

If we want him to be a big off-field mentor, make him a development coach.