Jamarra and the Points System Strategy
Collapse
X
-
Re: Jamarra and the Points System Strategy
Those picks 52,53,54 would then all move up 3 spots to 49,50,51 since 4 higher picks drop out and 1 higher pick is created. In order to then package them up we would need a team who is going to use those picks, which might be the hardest part if it's true that fewer than 50 picks might get used this year.Comment
-
Re: Jamarra and the Points System Strategy
They will move up even further than that since we won't be the only ones matching bids with multiple picks.Those picks 52,53,54 would then all move up 3 spots to 49,50,51 since 4 higher picks drop out and 1 higher pick is created. In order to then package them up we would need a team who is going to use those picks, which might be the hardest part if it's true that fewer than 50 picks might get used this year.Comment
-
Re: Jamarra and the Points System Strategy
Swans & Collingwood look like they might need more points.Those picks 52,53,54 would then all move up 3 spots to 49,50,51 since 4 higher picks drop out and 1 higher pick is created. In order to then package them up we would need a team who is going to use those picks, which might be the hardest part if it's true that fewer than 50 picks might get used this year.
West Coast without a pick before 60 might be interested perhapsListening to Brahm's 3rd RacketComment
-
Re: Jamarra and the Points System Strategy
You know, Peter Gordon saved us in our hour of need. And so did BT.
Then at a time were crying for salvation, Peter Gordon came back to us, and so has BT.
I'm starting to see a connection."It's over. It's all over."Comment
-
Re: Jamarra and the Points System Strategy
PG decides to step down just as BT returns....
Hmmm.Our 1954 premiership players are our heroes, and it has to be said that Charlie was their hero.Comment
-
"I'll give him a hug before the first bounce and then I'll run into my pack and give them orders to rip him apart."Comment
-
Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023Comment
-
Re: Jamarra and the Points System Strategy
Jamarra Ugle-Hagan could become the richest teenager AFL has seen
Adelaide will gift Jamarra Ugle-Hagan a huge cash prize when it bids on the Bulldogs’ academy star with the club’s first ever No.1 draft pick. Here's what else is locked in.
Adelaide will gift Jamarra Ugle-Hagan a $10,000 cash prize when it bids on the Western Bulldogs’ academy star with the club’s first ever No.1 draft pick tonight.
The delighted Bulldogs will match the bid and secure Ugle-Hagan, bumping Adelaide’s pick to No.2 where it will most likely select ruckman Riley Thilthorpe.
Ugle-Hagan would become the first Indigenous player crowned as the No.1 draft pick since Des Headland (Brisbane Lions) in 1998.
The AFL’s draft sponsor, NAB, confirmed to the Herald Sun earlier this year that it would once again donate a cash prize to the dux of the draft.
While the Crows’ bold decision will deny their own player the $10,000,they want to stay true to their draft order which has Ugle-Hagan a nose in front of a group of four teenagers.
The money will come as cash instead of as an investment portfolio, as previously believed, and could see Ugle-Hagan become one of the richest teenagers the game has seen next year.
Matching the bid will see the Bulldogs’ second and final pick of the draft bumped to the very end.
That was a key factor in Adelaide’s thinking — it wanted to knock the Bulldogs to the end of the draft for competitive reasons.
The Crows don’t want to risk the Bulldogs taking a player they liked with their second pick, which could come before Adelaide exits the draft should Ugle-Hagan slide.
The Crows are confident that relinquishing the their first ever No.1 pick won’t hurt them commercially, given the player it takes at No.2 will still be their highest ever draft choice.
That player will still be a marketing goldmine for the powerhouse living in a two-team state and Crows fans can sleep comfortably that their recruiters were true to the talent order.
Just about every club agrees that mercurial left-footer Ugle-Hagan is the standout prospect in the draft, despite not playing any football this year due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria.
The Bulldogs are also thrilled that, after amassing a bank of draft points to be able to match a No.1 bid, they will walk away with their first top pick since taking Adam Cooney in 2003.Comment
-
Re: Jamarra and the Points System Strategy
So the bid is taken as fact now?- I'm a visionary - Only here to confirm my biases -Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: Jamarra and the Points System Strategy
I love this. The article suggests Adelaide is concerned we will take a player with our second pick that they might want. After pick 40, Adelaide don't have a pick until 80. So they are happy for us to take the grand prize no 1 pick, tell their no 1 pick they didn't rate him the best in the draft whilst seeing fit to dock him 10k? All this in the fear that they might have someone in mind at 80 that they are concerned we will take at 54? Have I got this wrong?Jamarra Ugle-Hagan could become the richest teenager AFL has seen
Adelaide will gift Jamarra Ugle-Hagan a huge cash prize when it bids on the Bulldogs’ academy star with the club’s first ever No.1 draft pick. Here's what else is locked in.
Adelaide will gift Jamarra Ugle-Hagan a $10,000 cash prize when it bids on the Western Bulldogs’ academy star with the club’s first ever No.1 draft pick tonight.
The delighted Bulldogs will match the bid and secure Ugle-Hagan, bumping Adelaide’s pick to No.2 where it will most likely select ruckman Riley Thilthorpe.
Ugle-Hagan would become the first Indigenous player crowned as the No.1 draft pick since Des Headland (Brisbane Lions) in 1998.
The AFL’s draft sponsor, NAB, confirmed to the Herald Sun earlier this year that it would once again donate a cash prize to the dux of the draft.
While the Crows’ bold decision will deny their own player the $10,000,they want to stay true to their draft order which has Ugle-Hagan a nose in front of a group of four teenagers.
The money will come as cash instead of as an investment portfolio, as previously believed, and could see Ugle-Hagan become one of the richest teenagers the game has seen next year.
Matching the bid will see the Bulldogs’ second and final pick of the draft bumped to the very end.
That was a key factor in Adelaide’s thinking — it wanted to knock the Bulldogs to the end of the draft for competitive reasons.
The Crows don’t want to risk the Bulldogs taking a player they liked with their second pick, which could come before Adelaide exits the draft should Ugle-Hagan slide.
The Crows are confident that relinquishing the their first ever No.1 pick won’t hurt them commercially, given the player it takes at No.2 will still be their highest ever draft choice.
That player will still be a marketing goldmine for the powerhouse living in a two-team state and Crows fans can sleep comfortably that their recruiters were true to the talent order.
Just about every club agrees that mercurial left-footer Ugle-Hagan is the standout prospect in the draft, despite not playing any football this year due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria.
The Bulldogs are also thrilled that, after amassing a bank of draft points to be able to match a No.1 bid, they will walk away with their first top pick since taking Adam Cooney in 2003.Comment
-
Re: Jamarra and the Points System Strategy
The only way it makes sense is if they planning on doing some live pick trading to move some of those picks around. Currently I don't think it matters whether the JUH bid comes at 1,2 or 3 - our second pick will still fall in between their pick 40 and pick 80.I love this. The article suggests Adelaide is concerned we will take a player with our second pick that they might want. After pick 40, Adelaide don't have a pick until 80. So they are happy for us to take the grand prize no 1 pick, tell their no 1 pick they didn't rate him the best in the draft whilst seeing fit to dock him 10k? All this in the fear that they might have someone in mind at 80 that they are concerned we will take at 54? Have I got this wrong?Comment

Comment