2022 Draft Watch

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Missing Dog
    WOOF Member
    • Jan 2007
    • 8501

    #391
    Re: 2022 Draft Watch

    21 is a tricky one depending on how the first round plays out. Similarly, to our first pick where we're hoping one of the top 10 slips out ( ala Humphreys or Phillipou), I'm sure there's a few that we may be hoping slide to 21.

    A few names who MAY be there that would be appealing include Hayes, Weddle, Hotton, Szybowski, Barnett, and Konstanty. It really depends on who pulls the trigger the night before. There's some handy half back types as well such as Cowan and Ryan that will be around the mark.

    Comment

    • GVGjr
      Moderator
      • Nov 2006
      • 45569

      #392
      Re: 2022 Draft Watch

      Originally posted by Swoop
      21 is a tricky one depending on how the first round plays out. Similarly, to our first pick where we're hoping one of the top 10 slips out ( ala Humphreys or Phillipou), I'm sure there's a few that we may be hoping slide to 21.

      A few names who MAY be there that would be appealing include Hayes, Weddle, Hotton, Szybowski, Barnett, and Konstanty. It really depends on who pulls the trigger the night before. There's some handy half back types as well such as Cowan and Ryan that will be around the mark.
      Weddle, Cowan, Darcy Jones and Ed Allan could be around the mark and it would be worth taking a chance of Brayden George who if we are patient with could be a genuine top 10 type steal. I like SA boys like Billy Dowling, Jakob Ryan or Jaiden Magor if we were to land Mattaes Phillipou at 11 to help him settle in but maybe they are still in play at 39.

      Do we hand out bonus points for Naughton style mullets and Daniel style helmets with our recruitment?
      Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

      Comment

      • Mofra
        Hall of Fame
        • Dec 2006
        • 15116

        #393
        Re: 2022 Draft Watch

        Originally posted by Swoop
        21 is a tricky one depending on how the first round plays out. Similarly, to our first pick where we're hoping one of the top 10 slips out ( ala Humphreys or Phillipou), I'm sure there's a few that we may be hoping slide to 21.

        A few names who MAY be there that would be appealing include Hayes, Weddle, Hotton, Szybowski, Barnett, and Konstanty. It really depends on who pulls the trigger the night before. There's some handy half back types as well such as Cowan and Ryan that will be around the mark.
        Some talk that Cowan slips after his combine results.
        I guess our 21 will depend on pick 11, we'd be unlikley to take two players who play the same position.

        We may trade back into the late teens as well using a future pick.
        Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

        Comment

        • bulldogtragic
          The List Manager
          • Jan 2007
          • 34289

          #394
          Re: 2022 Draft Watch

          Originally posted by Mofra
          Some talk that Cowan slips after his combine results.
          I guess our 21 will depend on pick 11, we'd be unlikley to take two players who play the same position.

          We may trade back into the late teens as well using a future pick.
          What do you think of Clarke & Konstanty (Davey jnr if he doesn’t go FS)? Say we trade in for three top 21 picks, using two on small forwards.

          It’s an area of need, and this type of players (good ones) can generally make an impact sooner. Some natural small forwards who are prepared to tackle, added to Weightman and Garcia, under the likes of Naughton, Lobb/English, Marra and Darcy changes the complexion of next years forward line if they could do like a Kozzy and play 14 games in s debut year. Allows JJ and VDM to perhaps be redeployed up the ground as both were half backs.
          Rocket Science: the epitaph for the Beveridge era - whenever it ends - reading 'Here lies a team that could beat anyone on its day, but seldom did when it mattered most'. 15/7/2023

          Comment

          • GVGjr
            Moderator
            • Nov 2006
            • 45569

            #395
            Re: 2022 Draft Watch

            Originally posted by Mofra
            Some talk that Cowan slips after his combine results.
            I guess our 21 will depend on pick 11, we'd be unlikley to take two players who play the same position.

            We may trade back into the late teens as well using a future pick.
            Yes, he tested poorly. Right in the bottom bracket for sprints and very average in the other tests.
            If clubs were hoping for a speedy back flanker he hasn't given them reasons to select him.
            Western Bulldogs Football Club "Where it's cool to drool"

            Comment

            • Stevo
              Senior Player
              • May 2008
              • 1096

              #396
              Re: 2022 Draft Watch

              How much stock do the recruiters take in combine results? While you can't really be slow or unfit I would think some of the tests don't really help determine the draft order.

              Comment

              • SlimPickens
                Coaching Staff
                • Aug 2010
                • 2929

                #397
                Re: 2022 Draft Watch

                Originally posted by Stevo
                How much stock do the recruiters take in combine results? While you can't really be slow or unfit I would think some of the tests don't really help determine the draft order.
                It depends on position played and the type of player. Doubt they're worried about speed and agility in a 6'10 ruckman, but if you're a lock down defender and as slow as treacle i'd say that goes against you.
                "Loves a scrap....oh yeah & he's a pretty handy footballer as well"

                Comment

                • Stevo
                  Senior Player
                  • May 2008
                  • 1096

                  #398
                  Re: 2022 Draft Watch

                  Originally posted by SlimPickens
                  It depends on position played and the type of player. Doubt they're worried about speed and agility in a 6'10 ruckman, but if you're a lock down defender and as slow as treacle i'd say that goes against you.
                  You could run a line through those who are really slow or unfit but I really doubt if a player is around the elite range for any particular test it makes that much difference for a player who is well above average. At some point the recruiter has to back his eye.
                  Good point that a ruck man will be compared to other ruck man.

                  Would these tests be more likely be used to talk a player out of being recruited or talk him into being recruited?
                  Id say we are keen to find reasons not to recruit someone.

                  Comment

                  • mjp
                    Bulldog Team of the Century
                    • Jan 2007
                    • 7477

                    #399
                    Re: 2022 Draft Watch

                    Originally posted by Stevo
                    You could run a line through those who are really slow or unfit but I really doubt if a player is around the elite range for any particular test it makes that much difference for a player who is well above average. At some point the recruiter has to back his eye.
                    Good point that a ruck man will be compared to other ruck man.

                    Would these tests be more likely be used to talk a player out of being recruited or talk him into being recruited?
                    It's all just information right. Is it bad to run a 'slow' 20m sprint? Well...were there already concerns about your leg speed? Or do you never get run down on field? The recruiters aren't stupid...they just put a puzzle together. The 2km test is completely dumb but the rest of them do tend to apply to the game...
                    What should I tell her? She's going to ask.

                    Comment

                    • Mofra
                      Hall of Fame
                      • Dec 2006
                      • 15116

                      #400
                      Re: 2022 Draft Watch

                      Originally posted by SlimPickens
                      It depends on position played and the type of player. Doubt they're worried about speed and agility in a 6'10 ruckman, but if you're a lock down defender and as slow as treacle i'd say that goes against you.
                      It seems more of a confirmation/surprise factor. If either of those apply, they're relevant.
                      If there is no surprise, no opinions get changed.

                      Bont has a slow 20m sprint time. Does it matter? Well no as his positioning is outstanding and if his top speed is ok and meets the ball at pace it doesn't impact on his play.
                      Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                      Comment

                      • Mofra
                        Hall of Fame
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 15116

                        #401
                        Re: 2022 Draft Watch

                        Originally posted by bulldogtragic
                        What do you think of Clarke & Konstanty (Davey jnr if he doesn’t go FS)? Say we trade in for three top 21 picks, using two on small forwards.

                        It’s an area of need, and this type of players (good ones) can generally make an impact sooner. Some natural small forwards who are prepared to tackle, added to Weightman and Garcia, under the likes of Naughton, Lobb/English, Marra and Darcy changes the complexion of next years forward line if they could do like a Kozzy and play 14 games in s debut year. Allows JJ and VDM to perhaps be redeployed up the ground as both were half backs.
                        I wonder where we play them? We're going in with a 3 tall forward set up, Weightman is a lock, we'll play a pressure HFF was well (VDM/Garcia/West) and a resting mid.
                        I get the quality factor and if they're the two best available at the picks it would be hard to ignore, but if we're overlooking a positional need on a line-ball decision it doesn't make sense.

                        There's also the develop cost - if we can only play one at one time, will any advantage the second small forward has over a different player at the same pick be redundant?
                        This Crows have a bunch of small forwards which means 3 will be playing SANFL at any one time. That's a big chunk of redundant list space that is wasted.
                        Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                        Comment

                        • Stevo
                          Senior Player
                          • May 2008
                          • 1096

                          #402
                          Re: 2022 Draft Watch

                          Originally posted by mjp
                          It's all just information right. Is it bad to run a 'slow' 20m sprint? Well...were there already concerns about your leg speed? Or do you never get run down on field? The recruiters aren't stupid...they just put a puzzle together. The 2km test is completely dumb but the rest of them do tend to apply to the game...
                          Why did they get rid of the repeat sprint tests? Didn't that simulate going from one midfield contest to another and test the players ability to create separation?

                          Comment

                          • Mofra
                            Hall of Fame
                            • Dec 2006
                            • 15116

                            #403
                            Re: 2022 Draft Watch

                            Originally posted by Stevo
                            Why did they get rid of the repeat sprint tests? Didn't that simulate going from one midfield contest to another and test the players ability to create separation?
                            Hypothetical - but if Alex Sexton was to test quick for repeat 20m sprints, would you trust him to pressure the opposition?
                            The guy thinks defence is just there to keep the crowd back.

                            I think the eyeball test is still pretty useful. Who cares if Jack Riewoldt tested slow? Nobody is taking the 'quicker' Andrejs Everitt over him now.
                            Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                            Comment

                            • Bornadog
                              WOOF Clubhouse Leader
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 67701

                              #404
                              Re: 2022 Draft Watch

                              Originally posted by Mofra
                              Who cares if Jack Riewoldt tested slow? Nobody is taking the 'quicker' Andrejs Everitt over him now.
                              I count this as one of the biggest recruiting blunders we have made.
                              FFC: Established 1883

                              Premierships: AFL 1954, 2016 VFA - 1898,99,1900, 1908, 1913, 1919-20, 1923-24, VFL: 2014, 2016 . Champions of Victoria 1924. AFLW - 2018.

                              Comment

                              • Mofra
                                Hall of Fame
                                • Dec 2006
                                • 15116

                                #405
                                Re: 2022 Draft Watch

                                Originally posted by bornadog
                                I count this as one of the biggest recruiting blunders we have made.
                                James Frawley went straight after our pick. Very few people rated Everitt a first round pick.
                                Although we shouldn't be too harsh considering most bulldog fans at the time were really hoping James Seller slipped to our pick.
                                Who? Exactly

                                You could almost argue the 2006 rookie draft was better than the 2006 national draft. Take out Tood Goldstein at pick 37 (!) and it's really really close.
                                Western Bulldogs: 2016 Premiers

                                Comment

                                Working...