Re: 2021 Trade Period Talk
The kid can play and he fills one of the two well-publicised holes in our list. As I mentioned on the Stengle thread, all of the talk has been understandably about ruckman- but a lightning x-factor style forward is something that we need to help improve our forward 50.
What happened in the GF (and a few games late in the season) in the middle was alarming, but our often dysfunctional (at worst)/hugely inconsistent (at best) forwardline has been a very long term issue and needs some focus.
A first rounder (assuming we win the GF) at 18, I would be ok with. Perhaps you get a third back. He was a pick 24 in 2018, so perhaps that is overs and the Second + something (like the third we get for Lipinski) might be more around the mark.
But here lies an opportunity to bring in a player of need and another indigenous player (also allegedly a focus) to boot. I hope we are at least putting our hand up.
The kid can play and he fills one of the two well-publicised holes in our list. As I mentioned on the Stengle thread, all of the talk has been understandably about ruckman- but a lightning x-factor style forward is something that we need to help improve our forward 50.
What happened in the GF (and a few games late in the season) in the middle was alarming, but our often dysfunctional (at worst)/hugely inconsistent (at best) forwardline has been a very long term issue and needs some focus.
A first rounder (assuming we win the GF) at 18, I would be ok with. Perhaps you get a third back. He was a pick 24 in 2018, so perhaps that is overs and the Second + something (like the third we get for Lipinski) might be more around the mark.
But here lies an opportunity to bring in a player of need and another indigenous player (also allegedly a focus) to boot. I hope we are at least putting our hand up.
Comment